We haven't won yet: latest (10/19) cliff's notes on AP scandal

[apefish]

Just to make sure it's in this thread...

We have two obvious dumping accounts also.

Romnaldo and I think the other was Supercard55

That's at least 7 accounts involved in this elaborate "rogue geek" plan where he made no attempts apparently to cash out- only to prove a point.

[mrmandelbrot]

I dont see anything suspicious about the way that hand was played. But obv a decent player with 363 access would play most hands normally to avoid detection.

[NNNNOOOOONAN]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
adanthar,

idk, i think to me that hh looks more like a player knowing what was to come rather than a player knowing what another player had.
granted once he saw the flop, he played like he knew what the other player had, but if he knew the cards, and wanted to reduce variance and ensure that he would pick up the chips already in the middle, why wouldn't he just shove preflop rather than flat call and take a flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

stop

just stop

he cheated

I am not going through another 3 hours of HH's to satisfy random people over an issue that the site has already admitted to

ok? ok

[/ QUOTE ]

chill the [censored] out man.

i never insinuated that he didn't cheat. quite trying to prove [censored], i'm not some random person you need to prove [censored] to.

i was just commenting on the difference between his play and POTRIPPER's play in case it might be something else we can start looking for in other hh's.

ok?
christ.

[southerndog]

the sheets thing kind of throws a new wrinkle in it.. Before reading the MSNBC article, I felt that it almost seemed like Potripper wanted to get caught. The fact that the employee sent that excel file makes it even more suspicious.

Bottom line, I want a superuser account.

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
i was just commenting on the difference between his play and POTRIPPER's play in case it might be something else we can start looking for in other hh's.

[/ QUOTE ]

oh. nah, seemed like the same clown.

[slickmick777]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
adanthar,

idk, i think to me that hh looks more like a player knowing what was to come rather than a player knowing what another player had.
granted once he saw the flop, he played like he knew what the other player had, but if he knew the cards, and wanted to reduce variance and ensure that he would pick up the chips already in the middle, why wouldn't he just shove preflop rather than flat call and take a flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

stop

just stop

he cheated

I am not going through another 3 hours of HH's to satisfy random people over an issue that the site has already admitted to

ok? ok

edit: also, it helps here when you're a superuser and know that two eights aren't in the deck so 87 only has 4 outs

[/ QUOTE ]
lol thats fair enough if you say it was cheating it was cheating.

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
Just to make sure it's in this thread...

We have two obvious dumping accounts also.

Romnaldo and I think the other was Supercard55

That's at least 7 accounts involved in this eloborate "rogue geek" plan where he made no attempts apparently to cash out- only to prove a point.

[/ QUOTE ]

The MSNBC article stated that he never cashed out any money. So I'm supposed to believe over multiple months he cheated playing on at least 5 different accounts, dumped chips to two other accounts for no reason at all, and never cashed out.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhttttttttt

Edit: And, in the course of trying to hack the system, this rogue programmer played multiple "cover" tournaments (and cover cash game hands) so his cheating wouldn't be so obvious? All this not to cash out any money.

[GaryTheGoat]

Admo,

A welcome addition to any thread. Lie Hard lol

Any line on the Seif/Stukin(sp?) heads-up (re)match of 2/15/06?

gg

[Suigin406]

after this blows over (hopefully not anytime soon), we gotta take a pole and find out which admo pic is the best

[mntbikr15]

AP lied, no statement.

One small bomb plz???