|
|
#11
11-09-2007, 03:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
I think I fold pretty quick. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah. Just bail vs. Nitty McNitNick and some random idiot. Most of the time nothing good is happening here. 
|
|
#13
11-09-2007, 04:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
Im felting this. Greg1OSU does 3 bet TT most of the time and a 7 really isn't in his range. He also like to check raise with decent top pair hands and he won't fold. [/ QUOTE ] You did notice that BB check/flat-called a 3-bet, right? So you're putting him on... well, I don't know... and greg on... well.. an AT that he flat-called with and now he's felting vs. two villains? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
11-09-2007, 04:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
Shorty doesn't really concern me and I just can't give greg1osu credit for something that beats us. He's plays top pair/draws like this all the time and there just aren't enough other hands in his range that we are concerned about. He may play like 78 or something like that but I doubt it given preflop.
|
|
#15
11-09-2007, 04:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
Shorty doesn't really concern me [/ QUOTE ] I stopped there. Thanks for the input.
|
|
#16
11-09-2007, 04:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
Wow, all you people folding this? SBs line could easily be JJ-KK or big suited; even nits call KQs-QJs in the BB here, right?
BB could have anything, including any two suited, 98, etc etc. Im not folding this getting 5:1, too good chance to see an overpair + a FD.
|
|
#17
11-09-2007, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
Im not folding this getting 5:1, too good chance to see an overpair + a FD. [/ QUOTE ] Unfortunately you are extremely likely to see more action, so your direct odds don't matter all that much. You are highly unlikely to improve. The real question here is whether you are willing to play for stacks. If not, just bail now and save yourself some grief.
|
|
#18
11-09-2007, 05:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Shorty doesn't really concern me [/ QUOTE ] I stopped there. Thanks for the input. [/ QUOTE ] In the sense that a short stack is more likely to be a bad player and a passive fish whose range is wide here, it's a completely valid point.
|
|
#19
11-09-2007, 09:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Shorty doesn't really concern me [/ QUOTE ] I stopped there. Thanks for the input. [/ QUOTE ] Whatever. It's some loose passive idiot with an $80 stack. He probably has 99 or some other stupid hand. Even on the off chance he actually has a seven, we are still likely in front of greg, he isn't folding, and he will makes up for any losses to the shortstack. Honestly though I think we are ahead of both players here.
|
|
#20
11-09-2007, 09:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA no good?
LOL at those not worrying about SB.
Also, peeling turn at folding to more action is horrendous. You really think this turn is checking checked through? Also, on the off chance that we are ahead at the moment we might aswell stick it in now, rather than give a free turn card to beat us. I fold.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
