Questionable posts by mods. *Official Thread*

[Mike Haven]

With all due thanks to an earlier thread idea by a poster, if you see any posts made by mods that you think are rude, abusive, overly aggressive, OTT, pornographic, circumventions of the profanity filter, etc, and you wish to draw Admins' and other mods' attention to them, please link to them in this thread, and name the mod in your post.

Please also post only associated responses in this thread, as extraneous comment is likely to be deleted.

Thank you.

[Mike Haven]

[ QUOTE ]
Please also post only associated responses in this thread, as extraneous comment is likely to be deleted.



[/ QUOTE ]

Kindly keep this thread for serious business, and use the "Decoy Thread" for general chat. Thanks.

[tuq]

miajag

[PlzHelpMe]

*TT*

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post12859050

plus the whiney*TT*** posts in this thread that have misteriously disapeared.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
*TT*

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post12859050

plus the whiney*TT*** posts in this thread that have misteriously disapeared.

[/ QUOTE ]
You mean these ones?

whiney*TT*

No "mistery" here, I can see them just fine. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[PlzHelpMe]

Post deleted by Mike Haven

[Dynasty]

I'm trying to remember a thread where the mods were as intentionally unhelpful as this one.

*TT* and RR in Brick and Mortar

RR and *TT* gave short worthless answers and then threatened to lock the thread just 22 minutes after the thread was created.

[tuq]

[ QUOTE ]
RR and *TT* gave short worthless answers

[/ QUOTE ]
TT wrote "it might be as many as 40% female in Vegas". If true, that makes the OP's question akin to "hay guise are there any successful white guys in the NBA?" and thus not worthy of elaboration (aside from the usual Steve Nash for MVP comments). You live in Vegas though and as a guy who plays poker as a source of income should be able to discern whether TT's comment is accurate or not.

Also, it's possible your post is a joke, in which case "good one". [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[*TT*]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm trying to remember a thread where the mods were as intentionally unhelpful as this one.

*TT* and RR in Brick and Mortar

RR and *TT* gave short worthless answers and then threatened to lock the thread just 22 minutes after the thread was created.

[/ QUOTE ]

its a case of knowing who the OP is, it was a thread waiting for misogyny to occur and B&M is not the right place for that type of topic. Neither of us were going to encourage the thread to continue so the best thing to do is cut off the topic at it's knees by acknowledging the OP's questions isn't valid and unless there is some redeeming value we cannot see then the thread will be locked. B&M isn't an off-topic forum, it has a sense of decorum that we try to maintain that would be the same as if you wanted into a casino to play. Nothing overtly derogatory about sex, race, religion, ethnicity is permitted because just like in a real card room some action would be taken if you crossed the line (admittedly the line exists all over the place depending on the card rooms staff). I hope this explains our collective thought process, as you can see we had very good intentions - separately and together.

Tuq - I am actually glad Dynasty made that post! Its a good thread to be used as an example, it lets us communicate our thoughts when there might be miscommunication about a simple day-in-day-out policy.