#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
Villain is TAG, probably on the nittier side. Other than that I don't know a ton about him. I 3-bet a lot PF if that means anything to you. Interested in what people think of this line in this spot.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) internettexasholdem.com Hero ($207.25) BB ($107.20) UTG ($92.55) MP ($111.65) CO ($104.25) Button ($100) Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $4</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $15</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $11. Flop: ($31) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, CO checks. Turn: ($31) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $21</font>, CO calls $21. River: ($73) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $69</font>. Is a worse hand calling often enough on that river? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
I usually would just bet half on the river. Take out what villian does on the river if you want better answers
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
yah 1/2pb on river vs tag, full pot bet on river vs loose passive.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
I guess what I was thinking is that if I were a TAG, I'd be super suspicious of something that looked like a VB, but might be more apt to call a larger bet. I dunno. We could probably nth level ourselves all day with that logic though.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
why not cbet the flop? No reason to control the pot here...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
[ QUOTE ]
why not cbet the flop? No reason to control the pot here... [/ QUOTE ] Flop check was for deception, not pot control. I don't always play it that way, but I like to mix it up against stronger players to squeeze out some extra value. To clarify: I 3-bet a ton PF, and often when I have some marginal crap, and the nit guy calls me, I'll just check/fold flops that don't smack me in the face. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
good.
i bet $45-50 on the river tho. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
If i where Villain i would be super suspicious to your flop check, because i CB a lot after my 3Bs esp. OOP.
I would be looking to play a medium sized pot, and i think i would want to imitate my hand as air or AK type of hand. The way you played it, i think it's quite transparent that you hold what you hold. Maybe i'm way off, but this is my first thoughts. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
How do you play AK in this spot? Play it like that.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
I like every street although I bet less on the river as well.
|
|
|