#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
u have QQ, not AA, so i'd bet flop and charge 6 outers (what are you doing if an A or K show up on turn, or even a T or J).
deception works when you're in position - u can't induce bluffs OOP. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
looks good
I would bet that flop alot do. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
[ QUOTE ]
deception works when you're in position - u can't induce bluffs OOP. [/ QUOTE ] what? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] deception works when you're in position - u can't induce bluffs OOP. [/ QUOTE ] what? [/ QUOTE ] oops, ignore the last part. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
I bet the flop. As played, bet less on the river to induce calls from smaller pps.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
[ QUOTE ]
How do you play AK in this spot? Play it like that. [/ QUOTE ] lol...erm, how do you play AK in this spot? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How do you play AK in this spot? Play it like that. [/ QUOTE ] lol...erm, how do you play AK in this spot? [/ QUOTE ] Sometimes c-bet, sometimes c/f (assuming OOP). Depends on how much I've been 3-betting him lately, and whether he's shown signs of getting fed up with me. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: QQ overpair v TAG
The fact that you've been 3-betting a lot makes me even more inclined to bet this flop. Lead flop, c/r ai turn, or lead river if turn gets checked thru.
|
|
|