Who is the better player in this hand?

[keikiwai]

proof's in the pudding baby!

[PITTM]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm starting to think that Player B was the better player here because he dragged in the pot. Because, frankly, that is what seems to go on around this forum, as far as I can tell.

A guy posts a graph, people don't see the hands, but if a guy has a graph that goes up he's praised..if he has a graph that goes down he's bashed for "sucking."

I just want to make sure everyone's on the same page here that it's all about "da Benjamins."

I want to stay out of this thread though as I'm seeking only serious replies to settle this dispute.

[/ QUOTE ]


HAHAHAHAHA. what could you possibly be referring to? Jesus you are delusional.

[Speel Posher]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i guess you think player b.....

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm here to learn and discuss theory so I'm starting to think that Player B was the better player here because he dragged in the pot. Because, frankly, that is what seems to go on around this forum, as far as I can tell.

A guy posts a graph, people don't see the hands, but if a guy has a graph that goes up he's praised..if he has a graph that goes down he's bashed for "sucking."

I just want to make sure everyone's on the same page here that it's all about "da Benjamins."

I want to stay out of this thread though as I'm seeking only serious replies to settle this dispute.

[/ QUOTE ]

If said player's graph goes down over a 1.6 million hand streak and it has been shown that he has been running close to expectation over that streak then yes he is probably not good.

if same said player has been offered help from multiple posters who make "da bengamins" and he refuses to try and get better because he "makes better decisions than all other posters in ssnl"...he is probably stubborn/retarded

hope this helps

[F0rtysxity]

If one of them was sitting closer to you, then it's the other guy.

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i guess you think player b.....

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm here to learn and discuss theory so I'm starting to think that Player B was the better player here because he dragged in the pot. Because, frankly, that is what seems to go on around this forum, as far as I can tell.

A guy posts a graph, people don't see the hands, but if a guy has a graph that goes up he's praised..if he has a graph that goes down he's bashed for "sucking."

I just want to make sure everyone's on the same page here that it's all about "da Benjamins."

I want to stay out of this thread though as I'm seeking only serious replies to settle this dispute.

[/ QUOTE ]

If said player's graph goes down over a 1.6 million hand streak and it has been shown that he has been running close to expectation over that streak then yes he is probably not good.

if same said player has been offered help from multiple posters who make "da bengamins" and he refuses to try and get better because he "makes better decisions than all other posters in ssnl"...he is probably stubborn/retarded

hope this helps

[/ QUOTE ]

it won't, don't worry

can you imagine being such a huge attention whore that longtime winners offer to coach you for free and give you advice on how to play better, and you refuse it?

[a breath of air]

idk why you can only select player b, i think player a played this hand more optimally.

[FGators]

I was getting semi-coached triumph, that went out the window. I got dumped. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[Mrage]

Player B imo

[prodonkey]

[ QUOTE ]
I was getting semi-coached triumph, that went out the window. I got dumped. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? Because u are too stubborn to listen? Big shocker there.

[FGators]

No, because he was too pissed off at my drunken coerced idiotic comments.