Another potential piece of the AP puzzle

[stuckinpgh]

1. I changed my mind about quitting.
2. I play there every day.
3. I no longer play site owners hu for big stakes.
4. At this point I don't think I was cheated, if I was it probably wasn't the only time playing online.
5. I no longer play site owners hu for big stakes.
6. I gag from the taste of chewy undercooked bacon.

[Schneids]

I am looking through all of my graycat hands and although in my heart I believe he is cheating I think it is going to be tougher to prove than some of the other names we've thrown around. Graycat has played a lot of hands that look like he is just a dumb maniac.

[hoppscot22]

im not so sure about graycat... but doubledrag is really shady...

[dboy23]

i think greycat is just better at cover play. If they were smart they could have just given themselves a 20BB/100 winrate at NL and not be so obvious about it.

[HOWMANY]

[ QUOTE ]
i think greycat is just better at cover play. If they were smart they could have just given themselves a 20BB/100 winrate at NL and not be so obvious about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, reading these threads I think you guys are incredibly lucky that the cheaters are complete [censored] morons. Had they not been so blatant in their cheating they could have still won sick amounts while having everyone think they are just horrible players that were running good.

[Michael Davis]

No, if they were really good, we would think they were really good players who were running good.

-Michael

[blah_blah]

exactly. especially in NL where hands go to showdown less frequently, if they were smart they would just 3bet the [censored] out of everyone pf (but not absurdly so, probably like 35/30 type play) and pick off cbets with air, while mixing in c/c-ing bad flops for them and c/f-ing turns. They could also bluff raise a lot of rivers or raise rivers where they have the best hand but want villain to fold to disguise the fishiness of their play on earlier streets.

[cowpig]

[ QUOTE ]
exactly. especially in NL where hands go to showdown less frequently, if they were smart they would just 3bet the [censored] out of everyone pf (but not absurdly so, probably like 35/30 type play) and pick off cbets with air, while mixing in c/c-ing bad flops for them and c/f-ing turns. They could also bluff raise a lot of rivers or raise rivers where they have the best hand but want villain to fold to disguise the fishiness of their play on earlier streets.

[/ QUOTE ]


all this would require a strong understanding of the game

[Perestroika]

The hacker is probably the type of player that thinks being able to lie really well and being naturally lucky with cards is who wins in poker. He probably didnt even realize that you guys would be mystified that he could run so well, much less even know anything about poker tracker and therefore the need to forge his stats.

[Botchman]

[ QUOTE ]
I am looking through all of my graycat hands and although in my heart I believe he is cheating

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO Well if you feel it in your heart, then who needs proof...hahaha