Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-02-2007, 03:42 AM
sumdumguy sumdumguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 558
Default Re: Link to the judgment

[ QUOTE ]
They are not like the racehorse-owner, who has access to the trainers, the horses, the track conditions and other such insider information on which to base his wagers. <u>Nor are they like seasoned card players</u> or pool players who prey on unsuspecting, inexperienced opponents. Rather, they are more accurately described as compulsive gamblers, who are continually trying their luck at a game of chance.

[/ QUOTE ]

The judge explictly distinguishes the lucky lottery winners (flawed system or not) from those with inside information (race horse owners), and those with skill or predatory systems (seasoned card players and pool players).

It's ironic. CRA loses another case against gamblers and the judge puts another nail in the coffin for the professional card player.

But people don't want the truth. They'll just point to this case and argue that playing poker professionally is not taxable because it's gambling. Eventhough the judgement reads: beating the odds is not taxable and seasoned card and pool players are not of the same category.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.