100-200 live, set hand vs tough opponent

[Victor]

3betting vs online good lag is bad here too. even if ak/aq are within range.

[2handed]

Yeah I think agree that my river play was bad victor, I was just saying that this player, while perhaps tighter and more predictable than any good online lag, is still a difficult opponent. He just made very few mistakes.

[NMcNasty]

[ QUOTE ]
This player is tough. Maybe not online good LAG tough, but for a live player he was very strong.

He had KQ of clubs. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

ah misread HH, didnt see the 3 flush for some reason.

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with going more on the flop. Normally I wouldn't mind calling the flop with the intention of c/r the turn but if you are going to be scared with any club (which is reasonable) then you're going to end up having to lead too many turns so I like putting in more action on the flop.

Turn seems good.

No way I 3bet the river. I don't think he's calling with any hand that you beat. He either has your crushed or is raising with the intention of folding to a 3bet and I don't think he folds a set of Aces on the river so you're not folding out a better hand.

Alright, tell me why I'm wrong [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

Like your rationale on every street.

[Kirby99]

[ QUOTE ]
If 3 betting river is bad your opponent isn't tough.

[/ QUOTE ]

This statement is retarded.

[CASINOCASINO]

p

[BradL]

uglylennypoker.com