#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chicago -- Resorts vs. Majestic Star 1/2 or 1/3 NL
I play both rooms frequently so I’ll take this question.
Both rooms are no smoking; both have bars close by so drink service is decent. Both rooms allow you to call in up to 1 hour ahead to go on the list- you need to take advantage of this to cut down on wait time. Both have about 20 tables. Dealers are about the same in both rooms , maybe a little bit better at MS. Chip cages in both rooms. Most tables have auto shufflers. Resorts: • Less space in between tables, room is much more cramped. • Resorts has not kept the room up vs. Majestic Star. Room is a little more run down, but not terribly so. • 1,2 buy in is 100 min/300 max, or 150 BB’s. • More donkeys, which is fine as long as the donkeys aint hitting. If they hit, variance is a mother. • Gotta go downstairs to get some decent food, but you can order some crappy sandwiches at the table. • Resorts gears itself more toward the high limit players, so sometimes lower limit games are tougher to get on, but not a real bad problem. • Has lost ground to MS over the last couple of years, fewer players, tables break up earlier late at night. Majestic Star • Much more room in between tables, room is bigger overall. • Room is in much better shape, newer tables/carpets/flat screens • 1,2 buy in 40 min/100 max (50 BB). This is the number one drawback with MS, the buy ins are screwed up. You can’t play poker, set mine, or bluff properly. Think about it; normal raise is 12-15 dollars; you raise preflop, a couple of fish call, and you’re pretty much pot committed with any c-bet. Too many hands become all in fests. • Caters to lower limit players, generally more poker players in the room at a given time. Players are marginally better, but clearly beatable. • Grill next to poker room, great sandwiches. • Room is better run, has gained in business over the last two years vs Resorts. |
|
|