#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance revisited HUCASH vs HUTRN
Simple math problem here.
Player a has $100, and puts it all-in every hand, with a 60% chance to win. Player b has $100, and puts it all-in every hand, with a 60% chance to win. Who's variance is higher? Please recognize that you've already claimed that in certain situations, player b can have a higher variance than player a. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance revisited HUCASH vs HUTRN
[ QUOTE ]
Simple math problem here. Player a has $100, and puts it all-in every hand, with a 60% chance to win. Player b has $100, and puts it all-in every hand, with a 60% chance to win. Who's variance is higher? Please recognize that you've already claimed that in certain situations, player b can have a higher variance than player a. [/ QUOTE ]player a obviously has a higher variance, DUCY? btw, good "math" problem |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance revisited HUCASH vs HUTRN
[ QUOTE ]
player a obviously has a higher variance, DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] *Please* tell me this is sarcasm. We're beyond the point where I can actually tell. Or do you honestly believe that in two identical situations (where you think you know what I'm getting at, but obviously don't), the variance can be different? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Variance revisited HUCASH vs HUTRN
Well since everyone agrees it's done, I'm going to lock it so it doesn't go any bad places.
|
|
|