Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 09-30-2007, 01:42 AM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: micro

[ QUOTE ]
From the USSF Advice to Referees on the Laws of the Game:

11.6 GAINING AN ADVANTAGE

"Gaining an advantage by being in an offside position"...also means being near enough the play to capitalize immediately on a defender's mistake.

This was precisely what I was referring to in my example. That's why my example should be considered offside and no goal. Always nice being told I'm 100 percent wrong though.

Stak

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Stak:

The only problem with your example of:

[ QUOTE ]
A player in an offside position is standing at the top of the penalty box. His teammate plays a ball to the opposite corner of the field and a defender runs over and attempts to clear it. <u>The defender takes a big swing and shanks the ball off the side of his foot, and it rolls to the offside player who scores.</u>

This goal won't stand. The player gained an advantage from being in his offisde position Even though the opposing team played the ball

[/ QUOTE ]


is:

[ QUOTE ]

from USSF Advice to Referees on the Laws of the Game:

11.14 BECOMING "ONSIDE"
A player who is in an offside position at the moment the ball is played by a teammate can become "onside" in only four ways.
...
3. An opponent intentionally plays or gains possession of the ball.


[/ QUOTE ]

According to the USSF an opponent "intentionally" playing the ball negates any previous offside position. A "mistake" (from 11.6) would be open to interpretation, but I assume it involves a defender who didn't see the ball only to have it ring off his head...things like that.

In your example it sounds like the defender intended to play the ball and just screwed up. According to my reading that puts the attacker onside and it not a "mistake" in the sense the rules want to convey.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 09-30-2007, 03:58 AM
stakman1011 stakman1011 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 102
Default Re: micro

Excellent point Chucky,

I was waiting for someone to point this out. This rule is very much open to the referee's interpretation. I've always assumed that when a ball is bouncing past a defender who is hurried and plays it rashly (thus shanking it), his shank does not rise to the level of "intentionally plays or gains possession of the ball."

The exception to the offside rule to me is talking about clear cases of possession that would result in the "free move the ball out to the blueline" argument that ikestoys has been making.

Add into that the clear probability that an offensive player in an offside position cannot help but affect the decision making of a defensive player under pressure, and I always lean toward giving offside.

Maybe that's just because I'm a goalkeeper who wants offside given in every situation!

Stak
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 09-30-2007, 11:56 AM
sixfour sixfour is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Manchester, pooflinging
Posts: 1,410
Default Re: Ask me about being a FIFA-certified soccer referee

Interesting thread. A couple of questions:

- it appears to me that many referees will stop play for a free kick for many minor infringements in the centre of the park, yet would never give a penalty if the same foul took place in the penalty area. Have you noticed this? While we don't want to see dozens of penalties in every game, if a ref isn't giving a pen for something he can't then give a free kick for the same thing elsewhere on the park...

- don't know if you watch rugby officiating at all, but would you like to see anything from there implemented in football? Personally if we had systems where only a captain can speak to a referee, 10 minute sin-bins for cautions and TV replays for scoring decisions, the game would be a lot better.

[edit - also what's your take on the Mikel red card from last week]
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:14 PM
kolotoure kolotoure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raising the flop
Posts: 8,167
Default Re: Ask me about being a FIFA-certified soccer referee

1. i am guilty of this sometimes but I don't think it is something you will ever see change

2. they are 2 different games and implementing these things at lower levels would be really difficult imo

3. I'm still unsure about that sending off. When a saw it in real time I thought it was a red but after seeing the replays I'm not too sure
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 09-30-2007, 12:33 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: Ask me about being a FIFA-certified soccer referee

No way in hell was that a red.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 09-30-2007, 06:23 PM
fredericksburg fredericksburg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 11
Default Re: Ask me about being a FIFA-certified soccer referee

It was a yellow card in my eyes. Did look worse from some angles though. Always nice to see Chelsea on the wrong end of these decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 09-30-2007, 06:29 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Team Slayer!
Posts: 24,282
Default Re: Ask me about being a FIFA-certified soccer referee

The Mikel foul isn't a send off once you see replays. Initially it looked really bad though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.