|
|
#12
11-26-2007, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] against a 68/41 A hi is a pretty good hand imo 
|
|
#13
11-26-2007, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc.
|
|
#14
11-26-2007, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better
|
|
#16
11-26-2007, 03:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable?
|
|
#17
11-26-2007, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better [/ QUOTE ] the point is he hardly ever has anything
|
|
#18
11-26-2007, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It has to be a pure bluff somthing like 30% of the time. That's assuming he'll never call with worse except FDs and he calls all PPs.
|
|
#19
11-26-2007, 04:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better [/ QUOTE ] the point is he hardly ever has anything [/ QUOTE ] well imo that depends on how he plays postflop...
|
|
#20
11-26-2007, 04:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It has to be a pure bluff somthing like 30% of the time. That's assuming he'll never call with worse except FDs and he calls all PPs. [/ QUOTE ] I think he folds 22 and 33 some % of the time, and calls Ax air some % of the time also.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
