|
|
#171
11-27-2007, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] During his bet SpaceGravy had a stretch of 2,000 games where he broke even. Just sayin. [/ QUOTE ] bwahahaha, you posted that while I was writing. I [censored] called it!! [/ QUOTE ] You didn't really call much. I don't think your results are meaningless, and I'm sure you're good, I just think your sample size is small because it is. Not rocket science. 
|
|
#173
11-27-2007, 07:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
How about a 20k at the 16s challenge?
|
|
#175
11-27-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] It's impossible to be > 20% in the 16s imho [/ QUOTE ] Well its clearly not impossible as Im doing it. [/ QUOTE ] You haven't even played 500 tournies. [censored] artard. [/ QUOTE ] speaking of retard, this is a very stupid line of thinking. Who the heck is going to continue at a level that theyre beating for over 20% ROI for 2000 SNGs? (or whatever sample size makes you happy, maybe 5000). If you want to put some money up on my ability to maintain a 20% ROI over a certain number of $16 SNGs im willing to do that. I love how regulars here turn into old coots when they here about a small sample size. "500?!! Why I remember once back in 1923, spacegravy himself had a losing period much longer than 500, clearly your results are meaningless son." So do enlighten me, at what point do my results become meaningfull? [/ QUOTE ] How's a $500 even money bet that you can't run at >20% ROI in the Stars $16 NLH 9-man SnGs for the first 1000 you play, starting Dec 1st?
|
|
#177
11-27-2007, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
Im sorry to hear you had such a bad run. The idea that 500 SNGs is a meaningless sample size, and 1000 has meaning is kind of silly. All that a higher sample size does is narrow the confidence intervals.
But im glad that you think that 1000 is a meaningful number as Im now closing in on 1000 ( im currently at 976) and my overall ROI is 39%.
|
|
#179
11-27-2007, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
1000 isn't very meaningful, you stupid [censored].
1000 is just the outlines of our prop bet.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
