|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
hes said many times (I think) that he knows he isnt qualified to answer this (he isn't). This really doesnt need its own thread.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
[ QUOTE ]
hes said many times (I think) that he knows he isnt qualified to answer this (he isn't). [/ QUOTE ] he's around the people who are qualified to answer...until those people can give him some names the posts should stop |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
Zero ldo
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
[ QUOTE ]
Zero ldo [/ QUOTE ] i dont think ourhouse would let her play in the big game |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
what a great thread, i mean, after David reads this he is going to definately stop making (what he thinks are) controversial threads contrived to generate more interest in his site . . .
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
jesus christ,
i am going to make a thread about this as well. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TO: David Sklansky
In his first thread, referring to KT's comment that the best online players can't lay down a hand, DS says "I barely know many of the players he was thinking of," so it sure sounds like DS doesn't think he is qulified to comment on the internet players.
damn. my post deserved it's own thread. |
|
|