|
|
#12
04-03-2007, 05:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another Bot Question
[ QUOTE ]
It's also theoritically possible to have unexpoitable play that is entirely non-adaptive. [/ QUOTE ] What do you base this on ? You mean it is possible to make a bot that doesn't change its game in different game conditions and just plays a style that is at least break even in a rake free environment? 
|
|
#13
04-03-2007, 08:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another Bot Question
[ QUOTE ]
Bots exist. Bots are present. If you want to watch a good bot now go watch any of the 50-100 Heads up limit holdem games at ultimatebet. The following players are bots. isaac168 St Justice banana234 maomao88 there are a whole lot more. Watch there timing. UB doesnt give a flying f**k because bot or human both = rake. -MrGatorade (Crazy Mike) [/ QUOTE ] isaac took me for $5k one day, maybe a little more. does it still play on the site? also, are you mrGatorade on ub? not a good session last night, was it?
|
|
#14
04-03-2007, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Another Bot Question
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's also theoritically possible to have unexpoitable play that is entirely non-adaptive. [/ QUOTE ] What do you base this on ? You mean it is possible to make a bot that doesn't change its game in different game conditions and just plays a style that is at least break even in a rake free environment? [/ QUOTE ] There is a game-theoritically optimal way to play poker, which is yet to be worked out. I guess if you had ten of these playing each other, then yes, your right, the rake would eat them all up. When it is discovered we are all doomed.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
