NHL Under System Broken Down

[RichAM]

[ QUOTE ]
Of course I read it, and it's hysterical. At 93% win rate, what's your average cover margin, 3 goals per game at least? I suspect your formula has been optimized to accurately explain past data rather than predict future results.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is no formula ... it's a chase system.

[MrFeelNothin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Of course I read it, and it's hysterical. At 93% win rate, what's your average cover margin, 3 goals per game at least? I suspect your formula has been optimized to accurately explain past data rather than predict future results.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is no formula ... it's a chase system.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you lose game 1, then double on game 2, lose, then double on game 3, win, whooooo magic one unit profit?

GL dude, you're going to get smoked.

[ QUOTE ]
I advise everyone to have at least 1000000-1250000 Units to start this system.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[manifest]

Why does everyone insist on flaming someone who comes up with a winning system. This is almost the same as the MLB Road Trip system that has gone 230 something and 0 this year. Atleast with this one you aren't doubling 5 times to win 1 unit.

Sportsbooks make their money off of idiots who don't know what they are doing. That doesn't mean there aren't +EV systems that smart bettors can follow.

This system is elementary enough to spot by any semi-astute bookmaker. Why do you think Vegas BJ tables have max limits? Anyone making a juicy living from this chase system, please let me know. You need sufficient capital for a high risk "investment" like this. Then again if you already have the capital, you're probably wise enough to invest your money much more safely elsewhere...

[manifest]

Please tell me where you can get a return of 80-100% in safer markets in the span of 8 months? I might have to stop betting on sports.

Also, it's not like you can get on different sites. Even if the bookmakers cared to spot this system you could always go somewhere else.

[MyTurn2Raise]

this is a chase system

it's essentially a martingale


you just try and duck the whammy

[Mr. 33]

I tried something similar with betting against home sweeps in baseball. First month up ~100 units. Fifth week, down 100 units....seven or eight (lost track) home teams got swept. When these systems go good, they go good, when they go bad, they're very bad. It was fun anyway.

[Thremp]

Meh. Its just a bad idea. More monies for me to take from bookies.

[Dudd]

I'm confused, how is this a Martingale? It looks like he's just betting one unit on the under when a certain threshold of x games in y days is met, and pointing out that you can bet multiple games in a row because you can bet on the third game in 4 days followed by the fourth game in 6 days if another game is played 2 days later. Where in this chain is a bet being doubled? The double push thing sort of looks like a Martingale, but it looks like some sort of logic where a team that doesn't go under while being tired twice is unlikely to go under when playing a third straight tired game. It doesn't seem to make much sense, way too obvious a phenomenon for the books to not catch on and adjust the lines, but I'm not seeing a Martingale, unless I'm missing something.