Full Ring : which site to choose

[MissionToMars]

hi,
i am a nl100/200 FR player. At the moment i am playing on Ongame but like everyone knows its hard to multitable there. I am interested if there are better networks. I thought about switching to one of the big sites like stars or full tilt but the bonuses are worse and the players are better i heared. Any suggestions where you get a good multitable software + good bonuses+ bad players?

[too eazy]

seems like FTP is the softest if you look at the data on rent's post.

[Landlord79]

FTP is rigged, UB has a good bonus + rakeback

AP is soft now, though I don't know how much I would entrust my $$ there. Good bonus + rakeback.

Haven't tried Cake yet.

[Das Budrick]

most of the better regs in this forum seem to enjoy pokerstars because of the high number of tables you can play and the VIP/frequent player system.

[notfreemoney]

i dont remember the last bonus for FTP players...

[MissionToMars]

hmm i think i will make a quick tour testing absolute poker,Full tilt and then stars. if no other sites seems better. I just wanna find a site where everything is fine and easy .

[RapidEvolution]

I love/hate notfreemoney's icon. LOL

I like both stars and FTP for different reasons. Stars' software is just plain better and has fewer issues with HUD. Plus you can play more tables and the VIP/FPP system is really good. FTP has rakeback and a bigger bonus, and I think the play is softer at FTP (at least at 25NL), but it crashes from time to time and takes longer to move your money than stars does. (At least, that's been my experience.)

[BadLieutenant]

notfreemoney , your avatar freaked me out lool

[HesseJam]

it took a while until I noticed what you guys mean. LOL.

[MissionToMars]

can anyone post the link from rents post? did not find it! thats why i opened this post