#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
yea, i mean i think this is good and all and agree w/ a lot of it especially live...but hand 1 seems really out of place. i'd feel fairly confident just c/f'ing vs. most live dudes, though i don't know how different the game was playing that you were in from most of the ones i've played in.
the others i think are fine but of course could vary. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
[ QUOTE ]
I think most people cbet too much. That is a big leak of theirs which can be exploited. But to exploit this you have to let them cbet. [/ QUOTE ]qft. If you play against a villain who will cbet almost always but not raise a donk-bet often (and will often fold his worst hands when facing a donk bet) then any strong hands you donk are only there to balance the bluffs with your weak hands and that strategy may possibly be dominated by just check-raising both your strong hands and (some) bluffs. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
I'm noticing a change in C/R vs b-3b frequencies in the medium stakes games I play with the balance shifting to the former. A few months ago it seemed everyone was constantly bet-3betting but now I see much more checkraises compared to bet-3bets. Has anyone else noticed this as well?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
kinda, I think its also going check/bet/checkraise/allin more now as well to counter this
every time I think about 6max strat now I think of aejones theorem - I'm sure that its hasn't made me a better player but its just funny cos it triggers me remembering all my donk on donk hands TY Aejones 4 the comedy [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
[ QUOTE ]
If you play against a villain who will cbet almost always but not raise a donk-bet often (and will often fold his worst hands when facing a donk bet) then any strong hands you donk are only there to balance the bluffs with your weak hands and that strategy may possibly be dominated by just check-raising both your strong hands and (some) bluffs. [/ QUOTE ] I seriously doubt you are going to find many players who cbet all the time and always think a donk bet is a made hand. Even if you did find this player it would be about 2,000 hands and some note taking before you really picked up on it. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
[ QUOTE ]
I'm noticing a change in C/R vs b-3b frequencies in the medium stakes games I play with the balance shifting to the former. A few months ago it seemed everyone was constantly bet-3betting but now I see much more checkraises compared to bet-3bets. Has anyone else noticed this as well? [/ QUOTE ] Where do you play and what stakes? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
[ QUOTE ]
So most of your checks without initiative are check-folds ? [/ QUOTE ] This is another problem if we over emphasize donk betting. We want to keep the CR open as a option with all types of hands: bluffs, draws, and sets. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
your example is pretty bad to donk imo, except for board texture
i'd say board texture and equity are the top 2 reasons to donk. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
examples 2 and 3 are bad. 1 is good.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Donking into the raiser, *theory*
people are raising donk bets more and more these days since people are donking more one pair hands.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|