Coaches and Coaching Sites: Getting a Free Ride?

[BluffTHIS!]

The thread discussing the rakeback forums brings to mind a similar issue. And that is regarding poker coaching sites, whether of individuals, or largers sites with multiple instructors selling articles, vids and custom coaching and review. These get discussed all the time in the forums, and there are well-known posters who derive income from harvesting customers here on 2+2. While it is true that they mostly don't spam, and rather that posters are asking other posters for their opinions of such coaches/sites, it still amounts to those individuals/sites getting a free advertising ride from the largest poker forum on the net.

And there is another issue as well, which is that such coaching is somewhat analogous to poker books. In the books forum Mason generously allows a non-2+2 author to make one thread or respond in other threads started by posters, about his book. But the book forum generates a lot of knowledgeable and critical discussion and review from many posters including Mason. The difference though, is that in order to give such a review, one generally only has to spend $25 or so for one book. But when coaching fees, or the monthly fees for large sites, run many times that, not only is Mason not going to pay that to review it, but neither are many posters. So those sites not only are getting a free ride, but a mostly unreviewed one, and on a site committed to giving and supporting only sound strategy advice.

I just wanted to bring up this issue as perhaps the admins might consider, as has been suggested in the past, a coaching forum, but where it (or they if more than one) must be sponsored, and otherwise not to allow discussion of such coaches and sites elsewhere on 2+2.

[[Phill]]

Banning discussion of Cardrunners, PXF and other smaller instructional sites like that is dumb. Seriously dumb.

Whilst you are on, how about 2+2 bans all mention of Cardplayer, Bluff and P5s.

I mean, its not like 2+2 even competes with CR etc.

As for individual coaching, provided no spamming is going on, that should be fine too.

2+2 is not the be all and end all of poker, it is here to simply promote and publish books and provide a talking shop for its users - discussing what is and isnt a good instruction site is definately part of providing a good service to its users.

I can imagine why this is not the same with book discussion - 2+2 publishes books and quite rightly restricts other publishers peddling their wares here.

Also, these sites whilst being miles better than 99% of books on the market are not competing with them.

[BluffTHIS!]

Phil,

The issue I raised doesn't have to do with whether individuals or companies are competing directly with 2+2 or not per se, but rather whether they are getting a free ride instead of being required to pay for advertising on the site, either directly or via sponsoring forums. Rakeback affiliates don't compete directly with 2+2 either, but they are not allowed to discuss their business directly or have posters do it for them, except in a paid context. Is there a reason why those coaches and coaching sites should be treated differently? It's not money out of my pocket, but it is for 2+2.

Also note your statement, "these sites whilst being miles better than 99% of books on the market". While that is your opinion, and possibly a correct one, its validity can't really be judged easily when the strategy advice in question isn't more readily (i.e. cheaply) available so that it can be more fully reviewed and critiqued. Look at all the books that have correctly been trashed on 2+2 over the past years for their inaccurate strategy advice. And then imagine that one of those authors instead of selling print material in a single book or article form, instead provided same via a subscription format only at much more than the cost of a book. And then that posters here touted that service. That erroneous would be getting both free advertising here, and a free ride for the most part from serious review and criticism. I don't mean to imply that the sites you mention are providing erroneous advice, but simply that in addition to getting free advertising here on 2+2 that affiliates are required to pay for, they also are providing their services in a way, calculated or not, to be mostly free from critical review, and on a site dedicated to touting only correct strategy advice.

[Wires]

Bluff,

Then where does it stop. As Phil mentioned there are plenty of services discussed in these forums that, while they aren't spamming, are certainly receiving significant promotion. Software such as HUDs and Poker Tracker, magazines and other publications, radio programs, etc... The list goes on and on.

If you start to regulate this content then the site suffers. The only reason the affiliates have been relegated to their own forum is because they were willing to pay to do so. In fact I would bet dollars to donuts that is was not 2+2 who actively solicited the affiliates but the affiliates who approached 2+2 about sponsoring a forum.

The reason a rakeback forum works is because there are tons of affiliates willing to pay to participate. If you started a coaching forum you would have Taylor Caby and 4 other guys participating. It would shortly go the way of the automotive forum. Most questions that would be answered in a coaching forum would receive many more responses in their respective strategy forums.

[[Phill]]

Wires,

I suspect 90% of responses in said coaching forum would consist of "Come to the forums on Cardrunners/PXF/StoxPoker etc" with the other 10% being "Come speak to me on AIM, see your PM inbox for details".

The point is you have to weigh up the pros and cons - affiliates were well known to peddle their business pretty unscrupiously back in the days we 3 joined 2+2 - it needed to be specifically banned in the Zoo because it became a problem.

The same cannot be said of such businesses - ive never ever seen Taylor promote his company here - but when a thread about the site comes up in the various forums he will often show up to answer a question if an answer is required (see Brian/Aba/SBRugby sorting out a problem Nath brought up in the BBV forum).

To simply say because they are poker orientated that they are a competitor is silly, and its clear 2+2 doesnt plan on competing with such sites.

Further, the people who do coach around here dont go around saying so - the most they do is mention it in their location - and these deals are likely net benefits for 2+2 due to the redistribution and dispensing of knowledge.

[ShakeZula06]

[ QUOTE ]
whether they are getting a free ride instead of being required to pay for advertising on the site,

[/ QUOTE ]
Even if they are why is that a problem?

[GrannyMae]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whether they are getting a free ride instead of being required to pay for advertising on the site,

[/ QUOTE ]
Even if they are why is that a problem?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a joke question, right? you are playing mongoloid's advocate?

[Sniper]

Bluff, Previous Coaching thread

[[Phill]]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whether they are getting a free ride instead of being required to pay for advertising on the site,

[/ QUOTE ]
Even if they are why is that a problem?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a joke question, right? you are playing mongoloid's advocate?

[/ QUOTE ]

Racism?

Plus his comment is 100% valid.

[BluffTHIS!]

[ QUOTE ]
Bluff,

Then where does it stop. As Phil mentioned there are plenty of services discussed in these forums that, while they aren't spamming, are certainly receiving significant promotion. Software such as HUDs and Poker Tracker, magazines and other publications, radio programs, etc... The list goes on and on.

If you start to regulate this content then the site suffers. The only reason the affiliates have been relegated to their own forum is because they were willing to pay to do so. In fact I would bet dollars to donuts that is was not 2+2 who actively solicited the affiliates but the affiliates who approached 2+2 about sponsoring a forum.

The reason a rakeback forum works is because there are tons of affiliates willing to pay to participate. If you started a coaching forum you would have Taylor Caby and 4 other guys participating. It would shortly go the way of the automotive forum. Most questions that would be answered in a coaching forum would receive many more responses in their respective strategy forums.

[/ QUOTE ]


Wires,

You make some valid points, and I certainly agree that rakeback affiliates are somewhat different. However it still remains that individual coaches or mega-sites are counting on the 2+2 forums for most of their marketing to cultivate customers, while not paying 2+2 for same. And somthing moreover that contributes to such coaches probably not posting nearly as much *substantive* content in strategy forums here, since they seek to sell what they have to say.

Also, as far the software aids you mention, excpet for poker tracker and HUD (and I could be wrong since I use none of them), they are mostly programs developed by posters here as shareware to help other posters. And AFAIK, reps of pokertracker don't post in the forums.

I only wanted to bring up this issue since I saw the debate over the rakeback forums, and am not interested in debating this ad nauseum since it's not my site or money out of my pocket. If the site owners of 2+2 don't care, that's fine.