Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > MOD DISCUSSION
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old 03-15-2007, 11:40 PM
MrWookie MrWookie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Treating my drinking problem
Posts: 17,411
Default Re: chaostracize\'s loc: - out of my jurisdiction

Mat,

That's not what I got at all. I think that "Coaching" and "Coaching see profile" should be treated the same, just like Cit and Jared. I think coaching references should be removed, personally. Unlike blogging which is sometimes non-commercial, coaching is a blatantly commercial endeavor, and if someone wants to use 2+2 to advertise for their coaching business, then they can take out a classified. Especially with the talk of specifically coaching classifieds, I say we nix it now in advance of that. In response to Leader's argument about doing allowing it out of the niceness of our hearts to valuable posters, well, we didn't let Sublime spam his affiliate business in his loc, did we? He's a valuable poster, too. Coaching might not be as lucrative as rakeback, but I still don't think it should get free advertising in the loc field if we're not allowing rakeback there.

If I was to draft some rules, I'd have them look like this:

1. No urls.
2. No mentions of rakeback.
3. No "PM me" or "See profile"
4. No mentions of coaching.
5. Allow "Blogging." Many blogs are free, and as long as 2+2 doesn't have blogging capabilities, I don't want to have to enforce all of these.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.