#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
i explain the flop check in the op. only concerned w/ river here [/ QUOTE ] well the flop check is terrible into two passive players, so lets address the simple things you are doing wrong first. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
Don't give pf advice River is all I care about [/ QUOTE ] this is a serious question... are you FGators? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i explain the flop check in the op. only concerned w/ river here [/ QUOTE ] well the flop check is terrible into two passive players, so lets address the simple things you are doing wrong first. [/ QUOTE ] ikes he said the one villan has been raising every ccbet. the second is passive tho still hate the flop check? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
yes, obv
if he's raising every cbet just go broke |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
yes, obv if he's raising every cbet just go broke [/ QUOTE ] |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i explain the flop check in the op. only concerned w/ river here [/ QUOTE ] well the flop check is terrible into two passive players, so lets address the simple things you are doing wrong first. [/ QUOTE ] ikes he said the one villan has been raising every ccbet. the second is passive tho still hate the flop check? [/ QUOTE ] if reg bets and fish calls, even worse spot IMO and even if fish folds its still an annoying spot as c/raising is dumb against competent players (only get called by better or shoved on with poor equity against his range), and cold calling just makes u lost in the hand, leading out is much better, maaaaaybe u could do this with a stronger hand (c/raising makes much more sense with it) but even then it would suck if this flop was checked around. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
yes, obv if he's raising every cbet just go broke [/ QUOTE ] hes been raising a lot of c-bets op said but with a fish behind and the fact that villain had apparently been playing back a lot - i think he is more likely to show up with a hand, i think reg's raising and shove calling range is waay ahead of hero's hand in this spot. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
hijacked!!!!!!!!!!!!! seriously tho - river is (imo)
c/f >>> b/f >>> c/c >>> b/c ??? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yes, obv if he's raising every cbet just go broke [/ QUOTE ] hes been raising a lot of c-bets op said but with a fish behind and the fact that villain had apparently been playing back a lot - i think he is more likely to show up with a hand, i think reg's raising and shove calling range is waay ahead of hero's hand in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] learn what a conditional operator means... IF he's raising every cbet just go broke. I don't see him raising extremely light here (b/c its multiway), but theres all sort of [censored] he and the fish can call with.... just bet. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: River value?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes, obv if he's raising every cbet just go broke [/ QUOTE ] hes been raising a lot of c-bets op said but with a fish behind and the fact that villain had apparently been playing back a lot - i think he is more likely to show up with a hand, i think reg's raising and shove calling range is waay ahead of hero's hand in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] learn what a conditional operator means... IF he's raising every cbet just go broke. I don't see him raising extremely light here (b/c its multiway), but theres all sort of [censored] he and the fish can call with.... just bet. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I agree with betting as said earlier, but not with going broke against reg. If villain is raising literally every c-bet over a decent smaple (4 c-bets or more) then sure go broke as hes prob a monkey. |
|
|