I win more on weekends in VEgas than weekends in LA.

[fishyak]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How big of a sample is this? Maybe you aren't good enough to beat the games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sample, spample, it's live poker for god's sake which will NEVER be statistically significant. Maybe you should sit down at Hips table and test her skills?

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you don't understand...let me explain it for you. If he has played a lot in LA over time maybe those results are the expected outcome for his level of skill. So he goes to Vegas every 45 days, maybe the games were very good during his stay, maybe he got a sick run of cards, maybe he sucked out on countless people...etc etc. Get it now?

[/ QUOTE ]

You have apparently missed the mountains of posts in this forum about the inability to generate a large enough sample size of outcomes to generate truly statistically significant results about being a winning player. By the time you have a large enough sample, particularly from live play, your skill set has changed. Hence, the POINTLESSNESS about asking for hand sample sizes, particularly one that gets divided by multiple locations, LA & LV. I "get it" just fine, thank you.

[surfinillini]

deeper starting stacks in vegas obviously, advantage better player