Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-11-2007, 06:26 AM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,347
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]

Uhhh how is this not the MLBPA? Look at the contracts of the players.


[/ QUOTE ]

Take the Indians, how many players are earning, and will earn for a few years, way below market value? Sizemore, Guitierrez, Peralta, Cabrera, Garko, Carmona, Perez, Laffy, Shoppach, Lewis. That's 5/9 position players, 2/5 starting pitchers, 2/6 guys in the pen and 1/5 bench players who are going to be collecting maybe 1/4th of what they could on the market for the next 2-5 years. Then MLB has the luxury of keeping players around as backups in the minor leagues paying them even less. You could play professional baseball for 10 years in a system before hitting Free Agency. The CBA heavily favors the older players.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-11-2007, 06:55 AM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
The way the NBA draft is structured gives owners a huge advantage over the rookies, however. It's borderline ridiculous, actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

But the #1 pick in the NBA makes WAY more than the #1 pick in the NHL. And if you're a 2nd-rounder in the NBA you're an unrestricted free agent when your deal ends. You're not bound to the 3+1+1 to restricted free agency deal that first-rounders are.

In 2005 Andrew Bogut would have gotten something like $19M for his 3+1 year deal. Sidney Crosby would have gotten under $4M in salary.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-11-2007, 08:40 AM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Uhhh how is this not the MLBPA? Look at the contracts of the players.


[/ QUOTE ]

Take the Indians, how many players are earning, and will earn for a few years, way below market value? Sizemore, Guitierrez, Peralta, Cabrera, Garko, Carmona, Perez, Laffy, Shoppach, Lewis. That's 5/9 position players, 2/5 starting pitchers, 2/6 guys in the pen and 1/5 bench players who are going to be collecting maybe 1/4th of what they could on the market for the next 2-5 years. Then MLB has the luxury of keeping players around as backups in the minor leagues paying them even less. You could play professional baseball for 10 years in a system before hitting Free Agency. The CBA heavily favors the older players.

[/ QUOTE ]

While that is true, baseball has a minor league system while the NFL and NBA treat colleges as if they were the minor leagues (where the athletes "don't get paid"). Baseball players are compensated at all levels of competition (even if it sucks in the minors), and contracts are guaranteed. As long as you get to free agency, you're doing pretty damn good. Just because Lewis, Sizemore, et. al. are making less than market value now doesn't mean the MLBPA sucks - when these players are granted FA, they will be overpaid anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-11-2007, 08:41 AM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The way the NBA draft is structured gives owners a huge advantage over the rookies, however. It's borderline ridiculous, actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

But the #1 pick in the NBA makes WAY more than the #1 pick in the NHL. And if you're a 2nd-rounder in the NBA you're an unrestricted free agent when your deal ends. You're not bound to the 3+1+1 to restricted free agency deal that first-rounders are.

In 2005 Andrew Bogut would have gotten something like $19M for his 3+1 year deal. Sidney Crosby would have gotten under $4M in salary.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just think structured bonuses are totally ludicrous, considering the talent is subject to a ton of variance from year to year.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-11-2007, 10:07 AM
4 High 4 High is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Team Pretendinitis
Posts: 3,617
Default Re: Best Players Union?

MLBPA and its not even close.

I have no idea how the NFL manages to have the weakest Union when i believe as a sport it generates the most money.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-11-2007, 10:22 AM
Killua Killua is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 185
Default Re: Best Players Union?

Isn't the NFL cba expiring next year anyways? I assume the players will be asking for a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-11-2007, 11:12 AM
IrishHand IrishHand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,270
Default Re: Best Players Union?

MLB. Not close.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2007, 11:12 AM
THEOSU THEOSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: being awesome. duh.
Posts: 7,784
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't the NFL cba expiring next year anyways? I assume the players will be asking for a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]

and i'm sure the owners will come out ahead. again. like always.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-11-2007, 11:16 AM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The way the NBA draft is structured gives owners a huge advantage over the rookies, however. It's borderline ridiculous, actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

But the #1 pick in the NBA makes WAY more than the #1 pick in the NHL. And if you're a 2nd-rounder in the NBA you're an unrestricted free agent when your deal ends. You're not bound to the 3+1+1 to restricted free agency deal that first-rounders are.

In 2005 Andrew Bogut would have gotten something like $19M for his 3+1 year deal. Sidney Crosby would have gotten under $4M in salary.

[/ QUOTE ]

However, Crosby earned several million in bonuses, and will make 8.7 million next year as a 21 year old.

Entry level contracts in the NHL are small because generally a player on one isn't that good.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-11-2007, 11:18 AM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,347
Default Re: Best Players Union?

[ QUOTE ]
Just because Lewis, Sizemore, et. al. are making less than market value now doesn't mean the MLBPA sucks - when these players are granted FA, they will be overpaid anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

And how many players don't make up that money because of injuries? Seeing a pitcher put up three or four valuable (relative to his contract) seasons and then succumbing to arm problems is not an uncommon story in MLB.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.