Speciies? you gotta be kidding.

[Rduke55]

[ QUOTE ]
BFOD's.

They're rascals when they need to be.

Think of scalar time, not linear. Give it three-dimensional growths against a 'brane matrice.

And you realize at a very, very basic level that every baryonic bit has its opposite (and far more than that, but see above paragraph/statement, you get the idea.)

Since this is still the early 21st, and the advances, while faster, aren't automatic, each and every previous definition shouldn't be thrown out, but be used as a evolutionary concept/frame.

For the previous centuries, it was enough to develop Darwinism, because it was an interpretation that made sense at the time.

And I guess today both creationism and Darwinism and evolution/devolution can be merged based on individual perception.

Art is creation. Because you create, that does not make you an isolated source drawing something out of clay. As ever was, this species draws its art from what it perceives.

Or something. Y'all get the idea. Take tuna. It exists, both as individual fish, schools of fish, and in canned form. It's mutatable because society and progress has made it so. You draw resources when you eat it, and it, in essence, becomes part of you.

Does that make you tuna? No. But the interaction pretty much makes it a Gaean mesh.

GL with the rest.

[/ QUOTE ]

Problem solved.