#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
Only hand i'm really worried about is AJ. It's pretty e-z call imo.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
easy call. if hes 40/10 he obv doesnt understand the game well enough to only have AJ here
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
SNAP call
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
[ QUOTE ]
SNAP call [/ QUOTE ] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
It's very tempting to fold as AJ is very very likely. but getting 2.4-1 you are probably good enough considering he is 40/10. Over how many hands is he 40/10?
edit wow just realized this was blind on blind makes the call significantly easier in my mind |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
lol am i the only folder in the bunch?
i want to see some results so i can be like booya. or, slink back into shametown. hopefully booya. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
I call this pretty fast
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400NL: Top+bottom pair semideep
eh, i'm not sure this is an insta-call as some are making it out to be but i don't think i could fold. maybe if he never c/r's turn and if this is an accurate sample size, as well as him insta-shoving turn. either way in a vacuum with the given reads i would call and expect to be ahead very often, but i could definitely see a time and a place to fold this vs. a guy like the one i assume villain is.
|
|
|