#1
|
|||
|
|||
Statistical Anomaly.
Play 100k hands of "winning" (theoretically) poker and lose money.
I'm on pace to do that. Set over set is standard. AA to flopped set is standard. Royal Flush over Top two pair is standard. Quads over flopped set is standard. AKsuited against AA with 100BB stacks is standard. AK pushing against QQ and winning every time is standard. AK missing 90% of the time is standard. 100k hands of "winning poker" = losing money. I'm just going to accept I have Christopher Reeves bad luck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
Quads over flopped set is standard. [/ QUOTE ] Stop playing on Cheetumpoker.org, on most sites theres only 4 of every rank in a deck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
Sorry FGators junior, if you played 100k hands at 50NL and are down money, you are NOT playing winning poker.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
$50NL Phenom [/ QUOTE ] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry FGators junior, if you played 100k hands at 50NL and are down money, you are NOT playing winning poker. [/ QUOTE ] It's possible |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sorry FGators junior, if you played 100k hands at 50NL and are down money, you are NOT playing winning poker. [/ QUOTE ] It's possible [/ QUOTE ] no |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sorry FGators junior, if you played 100k hands at 50NL and are down money, you are NOT playing winning poker. [/ QUOTE ] It's possible [/ QUOTE ] no [/ QUOTE ] It is possible but very unlikely |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sorry FGators junior, if you played 100k hands at 50NL and are down money, you are NOT playing winning poker. [/ QUOTE ] It's possible [/ QUOTE ] no [/ QUOTE ] It is possible but very unlikely [/ QUOTE ] With so many hands dealt and so many people playing it seems likely that it will eventually happen, to someone. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
[ QUOTE ]
With so many hands dealt and so many people playing it seems likely that it will eventually happen, to someone. [/ QUOTE ] WTF? GW can we put a sticky that's just a link to Occam's Razor or something? Where are these tards coming from? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Statistical Anomaly.
he is right though. you both are.
|
|
|