Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 09-12-2007, 04:01 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: BluffThis and Chezlaw\'s Weird Philosophical Contortions

[ QUOTE ]
2) If we are being forced to make these decisions, there could be a time when we have to pick something we are morally/philosophically opposed to. You can't force BluffThis and Chezlaw to pick something and then yell at them for making a contortion. You asked them to contort!

[/ QUOTE ]
No, but if they use flawed or demonstratively absurd reasoning, then you can yell at them. Or at least point out that something is wrong or inconsistent in the way they make tough decisions. Enter Sklansky.

And so many decisions are contortions. The stem cell debate has moral and philosophical objections no matter what side you choose. If you can't get to a position with some modicum of consistency (or worse, if you claim consistency and logical supremacy for arbitrary and inconsistent positions, a la BluffTHIS!), then you should be exposed.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.