Session Reviews

jasonfish11 · #1 12-02-2007, 12:29 AM

[ QUOTE ]
should they be standard, tricky, what or does it matter???

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe you should probably just pull your last 100 hands. This way we can see how you play standard hands and maybe find something you might want to do differently there and it should also have 1 or 2 tricky hands where there might be some leaks. But I think randomness is a good thing and selectivly pulling certain HHs would not be as productive to everyone.

Jailblazers · #2 12-02-2007, 12:35 AM

Also a few more questions.

1. Do you want us to show the results so that our reviewer doesn't get result-oriented?

2. Do you want the hands that YOU played? not just the raw files that you might get from getting HH sent to your email.

Edit: More questions. What are we looking for when we review the HHs. General leaks? Obvious/exploitable play? It seems it would be tough to comment on a particular hand without any reads on villain whatsoever.

ICMoney · #3 12-02-2007, 01:08 AM

What would be the best way to view hero's hand without showing the showdown cards prematurly?

Convert the HH batch or what?

0uTpLaYeD · #4 12-02-2007, 01:37 AM

Hope it's not too late....
if not, please sign me up

Cueballmania · #5 12-02-2007, 02:33 AM

Outplayed, you can talk with Jailblazers and Ducatsti to see if then can incorporate you, or you can see if someone else wants to pair up with you.

You should send an unedited session. You should makes comments on each play our hero makes if you have something to say. This is more of a critique of normal play. Think details. "This raise is too big", "this bet is bad because...", "notice that this villian is loose, so do this", and "I like this river play, did you plan for it on the turn?" Sure you're at a disadvantage at reads, but you should be able to discuss them.