|
|
|
|
#1
11-09-2007, 04:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: what do you think of this ruling? (B&M donkament)
[ QUOTE ]
If you go to the store and buy 6 items, get charged for 5, start to walk out when the clerk notices the mistake, do you pay for the 6th item or is it the clerk's fault for not having charged you in the first place? [/ QUOTE ] Do you pay for the 6th item but also give it back to the store? 
|
|
#2
11-09-2007, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: what do you think of this ruling? (B&M donkament)
As TD, if you indicated you knew you were supposed to post, I'd make you pay an SB to the pot winner. If not, I'd make you post an SB on the next hand.
|
|
#3
11-09-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: what do you think of this ruling? (B&M donkament)
[ QUOTE ]
As TD, if you indicated you knew you were supposed to post, I'd make you pay an SB to the pot winner. If not, I'd make you post an SB on the next hand. [/ QUOTE ] But then the winner of the first pot gets shorted.
|
|
#4
11-09-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: what do you think of this ruling? (B&M donkament)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As TD, if you indicated you knew you were supposed to post, I'd make you pay an SB to the pot winner. If not, I'd make you post an SB on the next hand. [/ QUOTE ] But then the winner of the first pot gets shorted. [/ QUOTE ] He was compenated for that shortage by the fact that a player who might have called if he knew he had some equity in the pot in fact folded. Yes I know in this specific case that it is rather unlikely that the player would have called the large all-in bet simply because he had a small blind in, but the underlying principal is sound,
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
