Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-03-2007, 02:47 PM
Thinkards Thinkards is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 81
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

LA,

His putting you on a flush draw makes sense, but not a weak pocket-pair.

Once you called his reraise preflop and then raised him hard on the flop, he can't be thinking you are holding 33 or something. So, the worst he can think you are holding is TT or JJ, A6 (suited), or a big flush draw. By not betting the turn, you are allowing him a free shot at making a better hand on the river, and denying yourself the chance to either win a nice pot right there, or get extra money in if a diamond should hit the river.

Thus, in a rare case of treating a hold 'em hand like a stud hand, this is a situation where if you think you have the best hand, you probably should be betting it.


TK
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-03-2007, 04:19 PM
DJ Sensei DJ Sensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: pushing it to the limit
Posts: 7,419
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

looks good to me on all streets
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:10 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

i dont tank at all i snap shove turn as fast as i can.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:19 AM
ob1 ob1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: getting odds with the nuts
Posts: 90
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

[ QUOTE ]
i dont tank at all i snap shove turn as fast as i can.

[/ QUOTE ]

easily the best reply to this thread (.)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:40 AM
Betcheckraise Betcheckraise is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

got to reraise the turn, no other logical choice.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-04-2007, 03:41 AM
Oki-Oki Oki-Oki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Does EV come in buckets?
Posts: 1,225
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

I like how you played it especially if he like to bluff/bet at perceived weakness.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-04-2007, 04:01 AM
billybeartku billybeartku is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 554
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

so what did he have?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-04-2007, 02:29 PM
LAgambol LAgambol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 129
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

after i called, he held his hand to muck and said your good, i flipped over my hand and he folded. my turn play is key, i figure if i bet out he would have folded at that point. by checking behind, he bluffed at my 'weak' turn play. i wouldn't be surprised if he had a hand like AQss or a medium pocket pair.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-04-2007, 03:23 PM
DeMaci DeMaci is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orange County
Posts: 855
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

[ QUOTE ]
after i called, he held his hand to muck and said your good, i flipped over my hand and he folded. my turn play is key, i figure if i bet out he would have folded at that point. by checking behind, he bluffed at my 'weak' turn play. i wouldn't be surprised if he had a hand like AQss or a medium pocket pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems like a very standard live check for me, almost everytime. Online people always bet? Just different I guess, anyways, nice hand well played.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-04-2007, 03:42 PM
ipokeder ipokeder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: asdgpoiwjgu9g
Posts: 1,531
Default Re: big pot versus super lag live

the dynamic i think is probably a lot different online because there's a lot more regular bluffing and semibluffing that goes on online, whereas in live, 3-betting and playing mad aggro probably isn't as pervasive a part of the game so balancing turn shove frequencies and handranges isn't really much of a concern and people tend to think more in terms of maximizing a single hand EV

it might also be because when playing 20 hands an hour, it's a lot harder to think about long-term EV maximization since the long-term EV will take a few weeks to get that situation to pay itself off, whereas online you may get the same kind of situation multiple times in a session where it pays off with much closer proximity to the immediate-EV decision.

but i never play live so i really have no idea!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.