Absolute Soulreading/Rigged thread #3

[Chump Change]

[ QUOTE ]
no one will catch me. i have 400k locked up and im gone. im just a hacker. lol that pay back was for giggles. t was my last 30k there after a 350k withdraw. poor mark, sry bro

[/ QUOTE ]

...

[FIGHT_ME]

my name is squareview and I created a dumb gimmick to troll, making a few people do some work to double check a point

[apefish]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Comprehensive.. nice work.



[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Although, how does the title of this thread not have the words "superaccount" or "superuser" in it?

[/ QUOTE ]


I went back to try to edit it but max time had passed. I just went off the old thread name but yeah LDO. I missed the chance.

Part three coming.. Finishing off some food while doing it.

[FIGHT_ME]

my name is squareview and I created a dumb gimmick to troll, making a few people do some work to double check a point

[rjoefish]

Worst gimmick account. Ever.

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Comprehensive.. nice work.



[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Although, how does the title of this thread not have the words "superaccount" or "superuser" in it?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think we should focus too much on the whole "super account" concept. It could just be some little hacker program that intercepts the other players hole cards on their way out to the respective clients. Posibly within the program, before they're encrypted, or after on the network, if they've broken the encryption. That could also explain the lag when the cheater is moved to a new table.

Or maybe they've figured out a way to spoof the server into sending data a fake client, and somehow disabled the part that should detect multiple identical clients.

The point is, we don't really want to open up the door for them to come back and say something like "there is absolutely no such thing as a superuser account". There are other ways this could be happening.

[teddyFBI]

The only part I wish this forum would exercise a little more caution about is the allegations about Seif's potential involvement. Those claims are very, very dubious (i'm not ruling anything out, but I personally REALLY doubt that he has anything to do with this), and the only potential substantiation comes in the form of an uncorroborated report from a guy who Seif ran over HU >> WHO HAS SINCE RECANTED!

I just bring these points up to do my best to maintain this thread's credibility. The PT stats and HHs are IRON-CLAD, FOOL-PROOF, CONCLUSIVE. No reasonable pair of eyes can disagree with them. The allegations about Seif, on the other hand, belong in fairy-tale land (for now), and they shouldn't be held out to be authoritative; all they do for now is detract from the rest of the evidence's perceived legitimacy.

[Josem]

as always, teddyfbi is right.

[FIGHT_ME]

my name is squareview and I created a dumb gimmick to troll, making a few people do some work to double check a point