#1
|
|||
|
|||
40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
If you randomly choose a present day 40 year old American and a present day 65 year old, who is more likely to reach 90?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
ill answer if you rate my dinner david
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
You cooked me dinner?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
these seem about equal, perhaps a small edge to the 65 year old.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
ugh not health and fitness too.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
I choose the 65 year old.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
40
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
Would answers change if you say 20 year old versus 65 year old?
Clearly this boils down to one thing: Probability of dying between the ages of 40 and 65 versus the medical advancements made in 25 years. I'll take medical advancements in 25 years, I think the probability of dying b/w 40 and 65 is pretty small. I'll way favor 20 in a 20 vs 65 to reach 90. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 40 Year Old Vs 65 Year Old American Hitting 90
I imagine this could be solved mathematically.
Let f(x) be a function of the average life expectancy of an american male, where x is the year. Let g(x) be the death rate for american males in one year where x is the age. Find out where the two functions intersect. If it's > 40 years then you chose the 65 year old. This is probably wrong and oversimplified but someone who's better at math should be able to solve this. |
|
|