Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: traz
Exactly what I expected 0 0%
Pretty much what I expected 2 8.70%
Kinda what I expected 2 8.70%
Not really what I expected 11 47.83%
Definitely not what I expected 8 34.78%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:27 PM
thac thac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Go Buckeyes imo
Posts: 9,941
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

Apparently this jen&jes guy is a high-stakes ABS player converted to PS (badly)
  #62  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:28 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[ QUOTE ]
But I agree I think we're going to need to see more than one HH per account to make sure it isn't just some drunk guy with a load of cash. I mean, are these people playing a LOT or what's up?

[/ QUOTE ]

there is an account running at 65/50 at HS limit with a 75% W@SD. that account coldcaps preflop from the BB then check/folds the flop on a 522 board when someone flops a full house. over, and over, and over.

oh yeah and the ten high call HU on the turn of the toughest weekly tournament ever by a guy who busted within 5 minutes in the only two other low stakes donkaments he's ever played.
  #63  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:28 PM
Chump Change Chump Change is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: WITH UR POOR ROBBIN UR RICHES
Posts: 9,851
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[ QUOTE ]
Beat: Mods are FOS when they tell us they can't sticky a topic that isn't locked

[/ QUOTE ]


It's not an issue of can't, it's an issue of Reds won't allow it.
  #64  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:29 PM
keikiwai keikiwai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi. My name is Rosa Kato <3
Posts: 19,541
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[ QUOTE ]
is there any evidence other than a few hands? and even if someone CAN see someone elses holecards, isnt it possible that its because of a trojan and not absolute's fault?

i mean its possible hes just retarded/bad... heres a hand my friend saw today on stars where someone called a river shove with 10 high:

PokerStars Game #12067296948: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2007/09/15 - 04:16:08 (ET)
Table 'Miriam IV' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Luckycharm84 ($190.60 in chips)
Seat 2: kjell_morten ($576 in chips)
Seat 3: floes ($600 in chips)
Seat 4: jen&amp;jes ($578.10 in chips)
Seat 5: Raidan909 ($621 in chips)
Seat 6: hook2120 ($690.20 in chips)
kjell_morten: posts small blind $3
floes: posts big blind $6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Raidan909 [2d Jh]
jen&amp;jes: calls $6
Raidan909: folds
hook2120: calls $6
Luckycharm84: calls $6
kjell_morten: calls $3
floes: checks
*** FLOP *** [8c 4c 4d]
kjell_morten: bets $18
floes: folds
jen&amp;jes: calls $18
hook2120: calls $18
Luckycharm84: folds
*** TURN *** [8c 4c 4d] [3d]
kjell_morten: checks
jen&amp;jes: checks
hook2120: checks
*** RIVER *** [8c 4c 4d 3d] [6d]
kjell_morten: checks
jen&amp;jes: bets $154
hook2120: raises $512.20 to $666.20 and is all-in
kjell_morten: folds
jen&amp;jes: calls $400.10 and is all-in
*** SHOW DOWN ***
hook2120: shows [6s 6h] (a full house, Sixes full of Fours)
jen&amp;jes: mucks hand
hook2120 collected $1189.20 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1192.20 | Rake $3
Board [8c 4c 4d 3d 6d]
Seat 1: Luckycharm84 (button) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: kjell_morten (small blind) folded on the River
Seat 3: floes (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: jen&amp;jes mucked [Tc 9c]
Seat 5: Raidan909 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: hook2120 showed [6s 6h] and won ($1189.20) with a full house, Sixes full of Fours

not saying that nothing is going on... but is there more evidence than just "omg look this guy called with 10 high"?

that said i think it would be wise to stay out of the high stakes games on abs until this is resolved....

[/ QUOTE ]

is this an elaborate level, or do you not understand that the cheating is on absolute, and when they make redic calls w/ T high, it's because they WIN the hand?
  #65  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:29 PM
goofyballer goofyballer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THESE IZ THE OLD FORUMZ
Posts: 7,108
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[ QUOTE ]
oh yeah and the ten high call HU on the turn of the toughest weekly tournament ever by a guy who busted within 5 minutes in the only two other low stakes donkaments he's ever played.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe that's why he busted in 5 minutes! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
  #66  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:30 PM
luckyjimm luckyjimm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: blogging
Posts: 6,106
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

More damning evidence:

ABSOLUTE GAME #7469740355: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($5/$10) - 2006/12/16 - 15:19:51 (ET)
Table 'Peneleos' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 4: Dalmations ($597 in chips)
Seat 5: Lukieplaya ($4614 in chips)
Seat 6: gambler2k4 ($995 in chips)
Lukieplaya: posts small blind $5
gambler2k4: posts big blind $10
__2cb__: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Lukieplaya [4d As]
Dalmations: folds
Lukieplaya: raises $30 to $40
gambler2k4: raises $100 to $140
Longhorne joins the table at seat #2
Lukieplaya: raises $4474 to $4614 and is all-in
gambler2k4: calls $855 and is all-in
*** FLOP *** [8h 2d 3h]
*** TURN *** [8h 2d 3h] [6d]
*** RIVER *** [8h 2d 3h 6d] [2h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Lukieplaya: shows [4d As] (a pair of Deuces)
gambler2k4: mucks hand
Lukieplaya collected $1989 from pot
  #67  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:30 PM
goofyballer goofyballer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THESE IZ THE OLD FORUMZ
Posts: 7,108
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

Well, Keikiwai, if the dude that won that hand on Stars just now didn't have 66 but, instead, 97o, would you be suspicious?
  #68  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:31 PM
Pasterbator Pasterbator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ruining lives.
Posts: 4,795
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

i was amazed at how many people are getting leveled big time in this thread...

...til i found out that you seem legitimately concerned with decent evidence.

So unless this is a huuuuge joke, WOW.
  #69  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:32 PM
mayday4379 mayday4379 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 946
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

i think he's saying that crazy calls always happen. if the stars person won the hand with T high, would they be cheating?

I wonder if Jen or Jes made that call...
  #70  
Old 09-15-2007, 07:32 PM
schwah schwah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,962
Default Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)

[ QUOTE ]

is this an elaborate level, or do you not understand that the cheating is on absolute, and when they make redic calls w/ T high, it's because they WIN the hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

my point is that people sometimes DO call with 10 high and a very small % of the time they are going to be right. this is why you can't look at one hh and say "omg he can see peoples cards"

but it looks like theres actually a lot more evidence so.. yeah wow.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.