|
|
#11
11-16-2007, 09:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200PS: Somewhat lost PF and on the flop
An overpair looks more likely for villain than trips or a boat here and that hand would be happy to check behind, so going for a C/R is out.
Anyway, if I were playing the hand, after the check on the flop, I'd probably pot the turn to represent a bluff and then maybe bet $90 on the river as you could conceivably following up the bluff in case he was drawing and just over 1/2 the pot looks like you want a fold. As played, it looks like you have either a boat or a weak overpair. Since you're likely against an overpair here, I'd probably bet exactly half the pot or one dollar under half the pot to try to get a reluctant call from KK (or maybe AA from a passive player). 
|
|
#12
11-16-2007, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200PS: Somewhat lost PF and on the flop
he prob doesnt have a 7 so i dont tink theress much avlue in betting unless hes terrible and calls wth AJ which is also unlikel considering there sonly 1 J left.
checka nd let him donk his missed draw.
|
|
#15
11-17-2007, 08:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200PS: Somewhat lost PF and on the flop
no I definitely lead river, most likely he has an overpair or a 7, and he probably doesn't have a hand he wants to bluff with.
|
|
#16
11-17-2007, 09:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200PS: Somewhat lost PF and on the flop
must bet the river,
villain probably has an overpair and would be happy to check. To me a PSB on the river looks more like a bluff, it is almost as likley to get a call and gets paid more so I would normally bet the pot on the river. I dont like messing around with bet sizes on the river, just betting the pot is usually best and makes you harder to read.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
