If you can't beat in-and-out, make one up ...

[mute]

I remember this one as well. I actually think, that it was after figuring this one out, that I became better at these.

True of Da Vinci, but not of Michelangelo.
True of Manet, but not of Monet.
True of Van Gogh and Rembrandt, but not of Vermeer.

[Spook]

in.
true of in not true of thanks
true of mets, not true of excellent
true of humm, not true of clue.
true of maybe not true of others
true of will not true of ignore.

[antidan444]

It's not true of in (as I had it ... it cannot be true of any two-letter word).

But mute and spook are both in.

[antidan444]

I'm probably going to try to put together a more brutal (and original) one later tonight.

[HerbieGRD]

[ QUOTE ]
Time to use the French gambit for solving it...

I surrender.

[/ QUOTE ]
For the record - I'm Germany Biotch!!!!!!!

[clowntable]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Time to use the French gambit for solving it...

I surrender.

[/ QUOTE ]
For the record - I'm Germany Biotch!!!!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]
My history might be wrong here but France won vs Germany the last two times they went to war.

[antidan444]

[ QUOTE ]
My history might be wrong here but France won vs Germany the last two times they went to war.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a little like a football team getting beat 100-0, then the winning team being found to have used an ineligible player (who played on the third string, no less) and having to forfeit the win, and then the team that lost 100-0 saying, "HAHA WE WON BITCHEZ!!!!!!"

[clowntable]

Theory: Without the French the USA would still be a British colony :P

[antidan444]

[ QUOTE ]
Theory: Without the French the USA would still be a British colony :P

[/ QUOTE ]

That's not a theory, that's a fact. Go ahead, I can handle it.

[antidan444]

Well it probably wouldn't be a fact now, but it certainly would have been for a while longer.