|
|
|
|
#2
11-29-2007, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 50- TPTK vs turn jam
[ QUOTE ]
Shouldn't we be 3betting pf? [/ QUOTE ] i wouldnt 3b an utg raiser. i actually think it's closer to a fold. 
|
|
#3
11-29-2007, 06:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 50- TPTK vs turn jam
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Shouldn't we be 3betting pf? [/ QUOTE ] i wouldnt 3b an utg raiser. i actually think it's closer to a fold. [/ QUOTE ] i think we should either raise or fold, calling sucks with AQ, since we give others the opportunity to come in for a good price and often enough the UTG raiser folds and we win the pot uncontested
|
|
#5
11-30-2007, 11:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL 50- TPTK vs turn jam
[ QUOTE ]
With these stats villain will be opening wide enough even UTG for AQ to be ahead of his range so 3betting is good right? OP is villain by any chance k1nGNiLLe? [/ QUOTE ] Just because you're ahead of his range doesn't mean that reraising is the most profitable line. In position, your first thought should almost always be to call preflop and on the flop. Your positional advantage gets magnified every decision your opponent has to make. If you are raising, then you let him get all-in early which negates your edge. And any fold equity that you have preflop, you'll also have on the flop and on the turn. No need to rush things. And no reason to fear other people 'coming in'. They will be in worse position than you are and they will have worse hands. That is very profitable for you.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
