Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #451  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:36 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
Why can't we just take a cheap flop in position? (screw no strategy in BBV)

[/ QUOTE ]
You could, but why would you want to?
Reply With Quote
  #452  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:36 PM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why can't we just take a cheap flop in position? (screw no strategy in BBV)

[/ QUOTE ]
You could, but why would you want to?

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah, no [censored], this is kind of at the heart of your problems. Would you rather

1)Take a "cheap flop in position"
2)Win the pot
Reply With Quote
  #453  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:37 PM
Black Aces 518 Black Aces 518 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: play bad, run bad
Posts: 1,752
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
Why can't we just take a cheap flop in position? (screw no strategy in BBV)

[/ QUOTE ]

why can't we take the initiative in the hand to make it much easier to WIN WITHOUT SHOWDOWN, and also get more money in the pot with a hand that plays well against a SB open complete?
Reply With Quote
  #454  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:38 PM
[Phill] [Phill] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Blogging Again (Again)
Posts: 5,821
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why can't we just take a cheap flop in position? (screw no strategy in BBV)

[/ QUOTE ]
You could, but why would you want to?

[/ QUOTE ]

Plays the same as Big Jim?

You decide.
Reply With Quote
  #455  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:41 PM
keikiwai keikiwai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi. My name is Rosa Kato <3
Posts: 19,541
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

lol, nath looks conceited, GW looks sophisticamated, and Jim is looking like WTF????????????????????
Reply With Quote
  #456  
Old 10-16-2007, 06:47 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

rofl 'but how much did he lose?' hahahaha

fgators checking that Q9s is such a fundamental ftop error you have no hope
Reply With Quote
  #457  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:03 PM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
this is starting to feel a bit like.....
























[/ QUOTE ]

This is so awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #458  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:08 PM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]

lol, nath looks conceited, GW looks sophisticamated, and Jim is looking like WTF????????????????????

[/ QUOTE ]
i think fgators is trying to touch me in that photo
Reply With Quote
  #459  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:09 PM
BowToYourSensei BowToYourSensei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: backpedaling (for the moment)
Posts: 7,261
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

from kk's dilbert thread:

Reply With Quote
  #460  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:16 PM
hra146 hra146 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam, bitches
Posts: 4,041
Default Re: FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[ QUOTE ]
rofl 'but how much did he lose?' hahahaha

fgators checking that Q9s is such a fundamental ftop error you have no hope

[/ QUOTE ]


Oh my [censored] daylight. If you are seriously checking in the BB with Q9 here you ARE hopeless.

now you may come back with a line like "checking Q9 here doesnt turn you into a losing player. Its cause Im unlucky" then I got this for you:

Checking Q9 here doesnt turn you into a losing player, but it quite clearly shows that you have very little understanding of the game itself.

Say what you want, but before you come up with some counterargument pls answer this: Have you even TRIED to do stuff differently? Or did you just go on and on and on (like your graph suggests)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.