I hate TP vs nits - 200 NL

[awjpoker]

Yes the nitty cold caller could be setting a trap and now executes it on the turn rather than flop, or does he just sense weakness and take you off the hand? Same decision later street but harder to judge i would say. I go for flop bet and fold to aggression from nitty player.

[dirtylobster]

[ QUOTE ]
I like how you played it so far, now fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

[2Paul2]

If you think bb just drops 99-JJ on the flop to one bet your mad but the main problem w/ checking is you miss out on a possible 3 streets of value vs the big fish.

Also I think your giving bb to narrow a range. Yes he cc'd a 3bet but it wasnt a vry big one. he's only put in 12 which I can see him doing w/ at least any pair. Its not like it's gone 8/26/cc when his range would be vry narrow.

[Melchiades]

Think you played it well on every street. I can see why you wanna call the turn, since it really is a horrible way for villain to play anything huge. I'm still pretty sure it's a fold, since whenever I call nits because their line dont make sense they still shows me the goods way more often than not. Then I curse myself for paying off even though they are [censored] nits and always have QQ+.

[Jadawin]

I would c-bet the flop just for the sake of it. Next time you flop the nuts you want to c-bet as well, don't you? A little bit of difference in EV is far less important than maintaing an agressive image.

[Unknown Soldier]

pf depends on villains post flop tendancies, the more of a calling station (less likely to make moves when he misses) the more i like it. I read that someone said that KQs is an implied odds hand... not really. I usually call here


post flop, bet the flop. Turn muck it.

[martijn]

pf is standard vs fishy, I would bet the flop though.