25-50 6 max deep stacks on Stars - Page 14

DLizzle · #**131** 09-25-2007, 09:29 PM

major props to daniel for getting this implemented so quickly. Now it is on you guys to show your appreciation but actually playing at these new tables. There was bitching and whining about this for so long, now they are here, its 9:30pm EST, the tables have been up for a while, 0 action. There are 5 25/50 full ring games going right now, 4 with full tables and one with 5 people. Reminds me of when FTP added the deep tables and I sat there all the time, and the games rarely filled and didn't usually last long. Why should Daniel and Stars ever do anything for you again? Put up or shut up bitches.

Bukem_ · #**132** 09-25-2007, 09:30 PM

Another request for NL ante games, particularly at the midstakes levels.

Seems like a good place for Stars to try them out, and I could see them getting popular very quickly.

ShortStack03 · #**133** 09-25-2007, 09:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]
As for 50-100 NL, again I'm on the fence there too. The large seperation between 25-50 and 100-200 cound be a really good thing depending on how you look at it. I realize that you guys are likely winning players that just want to crush the games for as much as possible, but in some respects, even for you guys, it's better to "sheer a sheep many times rather than skin him once." LOL, what a goofy expression,huh? You get the point.

My worry about adding 50-100 is that TOO many unprepared players would make the jump, go broke, thus really hurting the 25-50 games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually the real reason they don't want to add 50/100 is because they can rake the 25/50 level over and over (thus sheering the sheep many times) where as with 50/100, when players go broke they can only be raked (skinned) once. PokerStars needs to give the players what they want and stop being so f'n greedy.

yaaam1484 · #**134** 09-25-2007, 09:32 PM

DLizzle: they just got up less than 1h ago, give it some days

craig1120 · #**135** 09-25-2007, 09:47 PM

1 vote for 4 max 50 bb min games w/ antes. Although I think that may be asking for too much.

DopamineRelease · #**136** 09-25-2007, 10:16 PM

One table is running now, straate won the first hand

Ansky · #**137** 09-25-2007, 10:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
One table is running now, straate won the first hand

[/ QUOTE ]

and draco is first to lose a stack... id never have thunk it!

technologic · #**138** 09-25-2007, 10:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I actually read every post (no I'm not gay lol)

[/ QUOTE ]

i loled

morello · #**139** 09-25-2007, 10:26 PM

One software issue I'm often annoyed at: I'm playing on a few Stars tables, and on the waiting list for a few others. If the box for a table pops up, telling me to either Join, Don't Join, or Wait, I MUST click on one of the options instead of taking action at the tables I already have running. It causes me to slow down the games and/or time out. I'll get to the waiting list popup eventually, but let me cycle through my tables first.

Not sure if I explained that properly or it happens to other people, but it annoys the hell out of me.

DerekJCEX · #**140** 09-25-2007, 11:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]

2. Min buyin atleast 30 bb every table

[/ QUOTE ]

This would be the best way to get rid of POS ratholers. IMO, it's much better than having a 40-50 BB minimum. The fish would be more likely to buy in to 30bb game than a 50bb game, and it'd hurt the ratholer's bottom line.

Either that or have the wait to return to the table with a new stack to over 3 hours.

People who buy in short don't bother me, it's these [censored] ratholers.