#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just another drunken session. (24bi in 900 hands w/ graph)
So I had a rough session at NL100 last night and after i had finished i decided to drink a few beers and experiment with some alternate strategies. I reserved 10 buy-ins for this mission. My strategy was basically to bet pretty much random amounts, and mostly minbetting or grossly overbetting. Getting my image right took a few buy-ins but after that things ran quite well. Towards the end of the session villains seemed to figure me out I guess.
I wasn't playing seriously at all during this thing but damn did it work well for a while [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] I'm happy with the final results though I think I maybe should've stopped earlier. Part 1: The setup: Here are some hands that show how i set up my image for this session: http://www.pokerhand.org/index.php?p...p;hand=1479746 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479747 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479754 (I showed) Part 2: Reaping the rewards: http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479758 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479769 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479772 they try to slowplay me http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479775 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479777 almost but not quite enough http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479786 keep chasing! http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479793 Ok those were quite standard, but here's another part to my strategy; suckout whenever you can! http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479798 25s>AK AIPF http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479806 learn to fold TPTK on flop idiot. http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479810 76o>top set http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479830 this is what you get for widening your pf calling range, you 13/9 nit. http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479817 why you calling me with no pair? A-high no good. (same guy sucked out on my AA with his AK AIPF earlier when i was playing for real.) http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479834 I believe at some point this guy must've been pretty tilted. good. for some reason they started calling me pretty light: http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479824 Then they figured me out and started using my sucking out- tactics against me: http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479848 you have my outs! http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479843 http://www.pokerhand.org/?1479850 I actually slowrolled him here. all for nothing. Here's the graph of the session: [image][/image] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 800 hands w/ graph)
Teach me
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 800 hands w/ graph)
My graphs look just like this when Im drunk, but then I move up and the graph goes straight down
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 800 hands w/ graph)
Oh what a fantastic and unique strategy. You should name it something easy to remember! Since you are both kinda loose and also pretty aggressive, we could do a contraction and call it LAG for instance!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 800 hands w/ graph)
I don't think calling allins with 5-8 high is part of lag strategy, but we could maybe call it stupid loose aggressive or SLAG maybe!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 800 hands w/ graph)
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think calling allins with 5-8 high is part of lag strategy, but we could maybe call it stupid loose aggressive or SLAG maybe! [/ QUOTE ] I'm sorry, I actually liked your post. I just wanted to knock you so I could feel better about myself...I-I-I can't read or write [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Damn you BBV for turning me into a monster! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 900 hands w/ graph)
Am I the only one who hates when people link to pokerhand and then refuses to look at them?
anyway, cool graph, sounds like a fun time |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 900 hands w/ graph)
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one who hates when people link to pokerhand and then refuses to look at them? anyway, cool graph, sounds like a fun time [/ QUOTE ] i do the same thing... f links, nice graph |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Just another drunken session. (24bi in 900 hands w/ graph)
u play ongame?
i thought i was the only one. |
|
|