strat threads - tagging instead of forums

eviljeff · #1 10-23-2007, 12:48 PM

what about a tagging system instead of forums for strat posts? think gmail labels...

[X] Holdem
[] Omaha
[X] No Limit
[] Limit
[X] 6max
[] HU

etc.

default tagging options to save time. thread software that auto-tags based on a hh would be awesome too.

pretty sure none of this will ever happen.

XXXNoahXXX · #2 10-23-2007, 12:50 PM

why would this be easier?

personally i hate gmail tags, but they are sometimes useful for multiple tags.

tell me a scenario where your system would make thing easier?

eviljeff · #3 10-23-2007, 12:59 PM

it's not about ease, it's about eliminating the flaws inherent in a fixed forum system. no more controversy over splits because everyone can perform a search that essentially creates their own desired forum.

XXXNoahXXX · #4 10-23-2007, 01:02 PM

i suppose. but what about people tagging their 1/2 NL hand as high stakes?

eviljeff · #5 10-23-2007, 01:07 PM

well the same exploitable "flaw" exists now. obviously there would still have to be moderation. admittedly the logistics would be more difficult.

holdme · #6 10-23-2007, 01:51 PM

thats a good idea afaik

holdme · #7 10-23-2007, 01:52 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i suppose. but what about people tagging their 1/2 NL hand as high stakes?

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah cuz they couldnt post it hsnl as it is

XXXNoahXXX · #8 10-23-2007, 04:35 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i suppose. but what about people tagging their 1/2 NL hand as high stakes?

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah cuz they couldnt post it hsnl as it is

[/ QUOTE ]

ugh. obviously. i just mean that its easier to tick a box then to go into a whole forum.

also, what about trolls and spammers that tick every box to put their post into multiple forums?

ispiked · #9 10-23-2007, 11:36 PM

eviljeff,

2+2 is still at Web 0.1 and you're proposing a jump directly to Web 2.0?!

kkcountry · #10 10-24-2007, 12:08 AM

i like this idea fwiw