|
|
#1
10-06-2007, 03:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
I ran into this guy in a $33 SNG on Stars. He was definitely the best player I have run into in $33s, probably better than anyone I've encountered in the $100s as well, but it seemed to me that once the blinds got to 100+ his play became sub-par at best. This is a hand from his perspective, I'm curious as to if anyone can make sense of it. He had a 15% ROI @ 33s.
PokerStars Game #12459270399: Tournament #63233503, $33.00+$1.50 Hold'em No Limit - Match Round I, Level V (75/150) - 2007/10/05 - 20:54:42 (ET) Table '63233503 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: xSCWx (1600 in chips) Seat 2: Villain (1400 in chips) xSCWx: posts small blind 75 Villain: posts big blind 150 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Villain [J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]] xSCWx: raises 225 to 375 Villain: calls 225 *** FLOP *** [8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] Villain: bets 1025 and is all-in Huge leak? 
|
|
#2
10-06-2007, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
looks like a pretty classic stop and go to me. he knows you're raising with a wide range, so he calls and shoves any flop. you miss 2/3 of the time and aren't going to call this with king or queen high, so i don't think it's a huge leak at all.
disclaimer: i've played like 10 SNGs in my life
|
|
#3
10-06-2007, 03:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
a player is dealt a PP 1/8 ( if im not mistaken) , so most of the time you are going to have two unpaired overcards, that will not make a pair or better 2/3's of the time, therefore i wouldnt say his shove is a huge leak... i personally wouldnt do it without any draw or real opportunity to improve my hand..
|
|
#6
10-06-2007, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
[ QUOTE ]
[x] Villain played well [ ] Hero played well [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't know his hand unless I played well. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
#7
10-06-2007, 04:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [x] Villain played well [ ] Hero played well [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't know his hand unless I played well. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] If you had anything but QQ+ this is false.
|
|
#8
10-06-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [x] Villain played well [ ] Hero played well [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't know his hand unless I played well. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] If you had anything but QQ+ this is false. [/ QUOTE ] A real hand would probably check/raise all in here. You definitely don't need QQ+ to make this call. I don't really see how it is feasible to have hit this flop unless: a) he called rags planning to shove any 2 (in which case chances are he didn't hit) b) he smooth called a PP (seems unlikely)
|
|
#9
10-06-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - This is a major leak right?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [x] Villain played well [ ] Hero played well [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't know his hand unless I played well. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] If you had anything but QQ+ this is false. [/ QUOTE ] A real hand would probably check/raise all in here. You definitely don't need QQ+ to make this call. I don't really see how it is feasible to have hit this flop unless: a) he called rags planning to shove any 2 (in which case chances are he didn't hit) b) he smooth called a PP (seems unlikely) [/ QUOTE ] Sorry your preflop play is bad unless you have QQ+
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
