|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Contributing to the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
Andrew Albright returned for the June issue of the Magazine.
Examining a Difficult Situation in Pot-Limit Omaha & Devising an Unexploitable Play by Andrew Albright |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Contributing to the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
well i'm drunk right now and busto online, but i honestly don'tknow if there was a point to that whole article
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Contributing to the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
Ehh, that article seems to be heavy on bad advice and overanalyzing a pretty untricky spot. I think any sane person can realize how ill-advised his choices for playing the flop are. FYA:
[ QUOTE ] C) You should just flat call since the only hands you are really beating are stacking off to a blank turn anyway and it lets you have some pot control if a "scare" card comes off. [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Contributing to the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
I agree, I think Mr Albright (I thought he was outed, but never mind) didn't realise we have top set and we should try to go all in.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Contributing to the Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
[ QUOTE ]
I agree, I think Mr Albright (I thought he was outed, but never mind) didn't realise we have top set and we should try to go all in. [/ QUOTE ] RT, If you are maintaining that in 100% of cases, regardless of effective stack sizes, the number of opponents, the drawing possibilities of the flop and the sidecards to go with the top set pair, that one should seek to get allin on the flop, you are in error. And if you need it explained to you, then I would suggest reading or rereading Chen & Ankemann's book, which only touches on the math of the situations, and is aside from any considerations of balancing one's play. |
|
|