JC Tran controversy poll

[0524432]

I'm going to make it as simple as possible. I want to get an idea of the #s on each side of this debate.

We all now know that the tournament ruling with JC Tran at Foxwoods was the "correct" ruling, according to the current guidelines. The question is....

Which is more important to you? The actual "rule" itself, which is currently in place to prevent collusion, and is easily avoidable by those who may decide to collude. Or, holding these people who decide to muck their hand while it is still live accountable. Maintaining the integrity of this game so that we will never see another player awkwardly pulling back their cards from the muck and simultaneously jamming their chips in the pot while we all shake our heads, because we ALL know the player has folded his hand.

Choose which you believe is BETTER for the integrity of this game...