Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-03-2007, 06:46 PM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa, on the farm.
Posts: 3,965
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No one has mentioned that in true Marxist theoretical system there is no State. He predicted that after the revolution of the proletariat the state would dissolve and all associations would be voluntary.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is a transitional period wherin the state has HUGE control and full control over capital. It is not clear exactly how the state would dissolve and seize to exist.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is no transitional period in pure Marxist theory. The transition happens due to historical and material social forces. It would be an "organic" process that happened "naturally".

Soviet Marxists theorized that a strong "state" would be needed to over see the transition when the historical requirements were not in place e.g. a mature fully industrialised economy and a fully developed social class of proletariat.

Because this did not exist in Russia at the time of the the revolution (russians were mostly peasants not proles)Soviet marxists such as Lenin and Trotsky created the idea of the Vanguard who would take controll of society and economy and manage it till the right conditions did exist at which point the Vangard would no longer be necessary.

However it is true that MArx was very vague about how exactly the state would dissolve in practise come the revolution.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-03-2007, 07:13 PM
John Kilduff John Kilduff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,903
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
No one has mentioned that in true Marxist theoretical system there is no State. He predicted that after the revolution of the proletariat the state would dissolve and all associations would be voluntary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bad prediction apparently.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-03-2007, 07:16 PM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa, on the farm.
Posts: 3,965
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No one has mentioned that in true Marxist theoretical system there is no State. He predicted that after the revolution of the proletariat the state would dissolve and all associations would be voluntary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bad prediction apparently.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Marx was a doctor he would be brilliant at diagnosis but crap at providing cures for the diagnosis.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-03-2007, 07:23 PM
John Kilduff John Kilduff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,903
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No one has mentioned that in true Marxist theoretical system there is no State. He predicted that after the revolution of the proletariat the state would dissolve and all associations would be voluntary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bad prediction apparently.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Marx was a doctor he would be brilliant at diagnosis but crap at providing cures for the diagnosis.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol, very good.

I wonder which will turn out to be more naively delusional, Marx's cure for the problems of capitalism or Bush's cure for the problems of the Middle East.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-03-2007, 07:28 PM
The once and future king The once and future king is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa, on the farm.
Posts: 3,965
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No one has mentioned that in true Marxist theoretical system there is no State. He predicted that after the revolution of the proletariat the state would dissolve and all associations would be voluntary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bad prediction apparently.

[/ QUOTE ]

If Marx was a doctor he would be brilliant at diagnosis but crap at providing cures for the diagnosis.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol, very good.

I wonder which will turn out to be more naively delusional, Marx's cure for the problems of capitalism or Bush's cure for the problems of the Middle East.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well at least Marx gets his predictions wrong because of his reliance on the logical methodology of Hegel, I doubt Bush could read one sentence of Hegel.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-04-2007, 12:14 AM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
There is no transitional period in pure Marxist theory.

[/ QUOTE ]



What would you call the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat," exactly?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-04-2007, 04:20 AM
Misfire Misfire is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,907
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

[ QUOTE ]
The Native Americans created a voluntary socialist commnunity, it worked pretty well for them.

[/ QUOTE ]

You and I have different ideas of what constitutes working well.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-04-2007, 05:06 AM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Shouldn\'t socialists support Ron Paul?

Oh yeah? what about Greenland then? (or was it Iceland) [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.