Stars vs FTP rakeback

[aditya]

Assuming one has 27% rakeback at full tilt, and you are platinum on Stars, which would be more profitable? Couldn't find it in search fyi.

[Reef]

you need to be supernova to compare to 27% RB.

[cbloom]

Stars is better because you don't pay taxes on points.

27% RB - 33% tax = 18% effective

[blackize]

[ QUOTE ]

Stars is better because you don't pay taxes on points.

[/ QUOTE ]

Completely untrue

[jkpoker]

FTP also has iron man and a points system to that increase over rakeback

[chrisg820]

[ QUOTE ]
FTP also has iron man and a points system to that increase over rakeback

[/ QUOTE ]

This is so true. As for this thread, i personally like FTP's RB better than the complex VIP system that stars uses. Ppl defend stars' vip program and I can somewhat see their point, just for me i like ftp better.

[marvin_1935]

This has NEVER been discussed

[CharlieDontSurf]

FTP is better unless yr Supernova and u can play consistently 12 months every year