#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100 - Pretty common spot where Hero is hoping instead of reasoning
Villain is 28/25/3.8 - cbet 100% - 120 hands.
Hero's image is TAG. Forgot to reload, too. Seat 1: Hero ( $88.50 ) Seat 10: Villain ( $102.90 ) NoTiLT11 posts Small Blind $0.50 jeremy18051 posts Big Blind $1 Dealing cards Your cards 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img][Hero] Villain raises $3 Hero calls $3 MrCashss folds NoTiLT11 folds jeremy18051 folds Dealing Flop T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Villain bets $5 Hero calls $5 Dealing Turn Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Villain checks Hero bets $12 Villain calls $12 Dealing River T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Villain checks Hero checks PF 3bet or call? Flop fold, raise or call? Turn check behind or bet? River check or bet? And please give me/us your reasoning. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - Pretty common spot where Hero is hoping instead of reasoni
it looks like its utg vs utg+1 so you can't really valuebet the 88 vs utg once he checks. If you do bet, you are turning your hand into a bluff and would want to fire again on the river if called. I'd recommend just checking it down unimproved though.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 - Pretty common spot where Hero is hoping instead of reasoni
[ QUOTE ]
it looks like its utg vs utg+1 [/ QUOTE ] Yes. Sorry for the messy HH. I have to convert these manually. |
|
|