|
|
#991
05-09-2006, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weekday WW redux
[ QUOTE ]
change my vote back to shortline synsid and yuppie seem to be filling up quick, with no explanations i still dont like synsid, but something made me change back to shortline [/ QUOTE ] Good to know, Scott. In case you missed everything, which you did, here's a brief synopsis of how these votes got started: Iron_Yuppie has been implicated by Durron's votes for him, maybe making Durron's death look like a seer hunt. SynSid has been implicated by his votes and posts around the time of Junkmail's demise. 
|
|
#992
05-09-2006, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who cares how their read was wrong, it was wrong. And there is something inherently dangerous when all your votes are based on following someone elses lead. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely. In fact because this is all that elevens seems to do, I think he may a be a good choice as well (but not this round). [/ QUOTE ] why not this round? youve got nothing else to go on, you say hes a good choice, but wont vote for him? why not? im just curious.
|
|
#993
05-09-2006, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
[ QUOTE ]
Tokyo's and traz's posts haven't swayed me much either way. BobO's first vote of the game was for Tokyo; it made it sound like there was some light-hearted history between the two. [/ QUOTE ] We vote for each other at the start of every WW game we are both in because we both enjoy greatly watching the other suffer. Yes we are sadistic.
|
|
#994
05-09-2006, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
Nice... 10 minutes left and I want to address a hundred different things. A couple notes... Amp's bandwagon seemed to derail rather quickly (if you can call it a bandwagon). Kyro brought up a good point about Fnord, I think it makes really good sense, others quickly begin to doubt. This is the first time we've figured out a decent enough reason why a villager was killed by the wolves. I had thoughts that Fnord was the seer, it makes sense to me. So for those saying why are people blindly following Kyro... whatever.
Yes I'm still suspect of Zurvan, Elevens, Alex, and always Kyro, but I'm not too keen on much anywhere else. Amp has been active in the Average III game and not this one. Why won't he talk here? And now with the defense of Amp heating up.. i'm starting to see some real connections between some people. I think we may be making progress here. Lynchings are hopefully going to start telling stories. And Kyro... you having doubts about yourself really scares me. But I'm sticking with what makes sense to me.
|
|
#995
05-09-2006, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
~10 minutes left.
[censored] iron 1 alex levin synsid 1 amplify alex levin chuckles iron elevens iron 7 iron yuppie kyro iron madtown Nicholas synsid patton amplify ScottHoward shortline 1 Shortline iron sumzero synsid 5 SynSid thebram synsid Traz iron tokyo synsid VoraciousReader iron zurvan synsid
|
|
#996
05-09-2006, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Who cares how their read was wrong, it was wrong. And there is something inherently dangerous when all your votes are based on following someone elses lead. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely. In fact because this is all that elevens seems to do, I think he may a be a good choice as well (but not this round). [/ QUOTE ] You did a great job summing up the Durron thing, but here you're totally misguided. Why don't you go reread MY posts a bit more carefully? Since when is following Shorty's reasoning the "cool" thing to do? That's all I'm doing here, because I think Shorty is a smarter player than he lets on sometime and is also a villager. [/ QUOTE ] Uhhhhhhhhh, what? I never mentioned shortline and I don't understand why you referenced him. Are you saying you've been following shortline and that makes you safe, cause that's just not true.
|
|
#998
05-09-2006, 06:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: weekday WW redux
All,
If you are voting for me because you think durron's kill was a seer hunt, that is a valid (if thin) reason that I can't debate. If you are voting for me because you have a read, well, you're wrong, but we've all been wrong before. If you're voting for me because I look suspicious because I put in a last second vote to try to save junkmail, well, I suppose that there's nothing I can say to you to convince you otherwise.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
