iSTRONG's Tutorial Video #3: 100NL 6-max

[iSTRONG]

I've made another tutorial video. This time it's 100NL 6-max. I play a much more TAG style than the other videos. As with the previous vids, it's target at beginners and intermediate players.

You can view my latest video here.

As always I hope you enjoy it and throw some feedback at me.

Links to previous videos:
Video #1
Video #2

[darom03]

The vid is great. What could be super is if you could comment a little on what range you put the other players on, when you are not in the pot yourself.

Give us some guesstimates as to what they are representing and stuff like that.

keep it up!

[iSTRONG]

[ QUOTE ]
What could be super is if you could comment a little on what range you put the other players on, when you are not in the pot yourself.

Give us some guesstimates as to what they are representing and stuff like that.


[/ QUOTE ]

Will definitly do that for the next one. Thanks for the feedback.

[ChicagoPoker]

I've been really enjoying these. Thanks a lot.

[darom03]

Uhh! and there is a minigame in it as well. try to follow the video-curser with your own curser! \o/

/at least its fun when stoned... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[jd2b2006]

Nice video.

In the K6s hand, I think you could have bet at least 1/3 PSB on river and gotten paid off. Villain in that hand had not played tricky up until that point. He seemed to play the hand like he had TP and it turned out he did. Even though you played that had like you had an 8, I bet he still would have paid off a smallish river bet.

In the A9s hand, great play on the turn and river. Jonas had been playing very passively postflop up until that point, only betting when he had a hand. I was amazed he turned up a total bluff. Keep up the good work!

[iSTRONG]

[ QUOTE ]
Nice video.

In the K6s hand, I think you could have bet at least 1/3 PSB on river and gotten paid off. Villain in that hand had not played tricky up until that point. He seemed to play the hand like he had TP and it turned out he did. Even though you played that had like you had an 8, I bet he still would have paid off a smallish river bet.

In the A9s hand, great play on the turn and river. Jonas had been playing very passively postflop up until that point, only betting when he had a hand. I was amazed he turned up a total bluff. Keep up the good work!

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right about the K6 hand. Unfortunately i didn't read him for top pair at the time (am not too sure why), I thought he had second pair otherwise i would have bet more.

[tufat23]

lol at u wanting to play K7o UTG if on UB

[iSTRONG]

[ QUOTE ]
lol at u wanting to play K7o UTG if on UB

[/ QUOTE ]

Watch the video #1 and video #2 (both played on UB) and you'll see what I mean. K7o is actually one of my premiums from UTG there.

[Riina]

Great video, very helpful and i agree on 'you-talking-funny'-comment in an earlier thread [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

2 questions though:

At some point you step back a lil' bit from raising the utg-limpers since they are inclined to call the raise frequently. And there you stop. Just questioning if stepping back is necessary if people tend to call your raises a lot but play very tight from the flop and a CBet usually takes down the pot anyway. Here the opponents in play seemed to call your bets in a rather loose manner with marginal flopped hands, so i can see you wouldn't be happy to have that situation with a so-so hand. But still, does your opinion apply for both categorys or just the latter?

On the 96865 flop with you holding K6 of diamonds, you remarked at the end raising flop or turn probably would be fine as well, as i can see but didn't you miss a serious valuebet? Seems to me he'd be inclined to call a reasonable bet as you could very well represent a busted flushdraw, as well as a straight(given how you played) wich would make him hesitant to bluff-checkraise giving you a pretty easy fold if he does?

Thanks for the vid and any input,

regards [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ,